ArticlePloS one2023
Access to perinatal healthcare in minority Anglophones: Hospital type and birth outcomes.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe assessed the relationship between hospital characteristics and risk of adverse birth outcomes among minority Anglophones in Montreal, Canada.
methodsThe study included 124,670 births among Anglophones in metropolitan Montreal between 1998 and 2019. We estimated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between hospital characteristics, including residential proximity to hospitals and language in which medical services are provided, and risks of preterm birth and stillbirth. Models were adjusted for maternal socioeconomic status and other characteristics.
resultsIn this study, 8% of Anglophones had a preterm birth and 0.4% a stillbirth. Anglophone women who delivered at a farther French hospital had a greater risk of stillbirth (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.28-2.18) than preterm birth (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.14-1.30), compared with delivery at hospitals closer to home. In contrast, delivery at a farther English hospital was associated with similar risks of stillbirth (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08-1.71) and preterm birth (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.29-1.44). The greater risk of stillbirth with delivery at a farther French hospital, versus greater risk of preterm birth at a farther English hospital, remained present in analyses stratified by maternal age, education, material deprivation, and region of origin.
conclusionMinority Anglophones in Montreal who travel to a farther French hospital for delivery have a greater risk of stillbirth than Anglophones who travel to a farther English hospital. This novel observation suggests the need to determine if access to perinatal healthcare in a woman's language may help reduce the risk of stillbirth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.