Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37071586›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2023

Population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analyses to identify a rational empirical dosing strategy for cefepime in critically ill patients.

Guohua An, C Buddy Creech, Nan Wu, Roger L Nation, Kenan Gu, Demet Nalbant, Natalia Jimenez-Truque, William Fissell, Pratish C Patel, Nicholas Fishbane and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Inclusion of Women, Children, the Elderly, and Individuals With Underlying Medical Conditions: Prioritizing Vulnerable Populations in Clinical Research.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Impact of ESBLs-PositiveInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Guohua AnDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6498-7663
C Buddy CreechDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Nan WuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1475-4503
Roger L NationMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1492-8590
Kenan GuDivision of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, MD, USA.
Demet NalbantDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Natalia Jimenez-TruqueDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
William FissellDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Pratish C PatelDepartment of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Nicholas FishbaneThe Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, MD, USA.
Amy WatanabeThe Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, MD, USA.
Stephanie RolsmaDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-2222
Carl M J KirkpatrickMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Cornelia B LandersdorferMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0928-4743
Patricia WinokurDivision of Infectious Diseases, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USUniversity of Iowa · USMonash University · AUEmmes (United States) · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200800008C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to identify rational empirical dosing strategies for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients by utilizing population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analysis. PATIENTS AND

methodsA prospective and opportunistic pharmacokinetic (PK) study was conducted in 130 critically ill patients in two ICU sites. The plasma concentrations of cefepime were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. All cefepime PK data were analysed simultaneously using the non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the PTA of cefepime at different MIC values following different dose regimens in subjects with different renal functions.

resultsThe PK of cefepime in critically ill patients was best characterized by a two-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination. Creatinine clearance and body weight were identified to be significant covariates. Our simulation results showed that prolonged 3 h infusion does not provide significant improvement on target attainment compared with the traditional intermittent 0.5 h infusion. In contrast, for a given daily dose continuous infusion provided much higher breakpoint coverage than either 0.5 h or 3 h intermittent infusions. To balance the target attainment and potential neurotoxicity, cefepime 3 g/day continuous infusion appears to be a better dosing regimen than 6 g/day continuous infusion.

conclusionsContinuous infusion may represent a promising strategy for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients. With the availability of institution- and/or unit-specific cefepime susceptibility patterns as well as individual patients' renal function, our PTA results may represent useful references for physicians to make dosing decisions.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessCefepimeChromatography, LiquidHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMonte Carlo MethodProspective StudiesTandem Mass SpectrometryAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefepime

Identifiers

PMID37071586
PMCPMC10474939
OpenAlexW4366240457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.