Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37071324›Full record

SynthesisAmbio2023

Tourists' valuation of nature in protected areas: A systematic review.

Milena Gross, Jasmine Pearson, Ugo Arbieu, Maraja Riechers, Simon Thomsen, Berta Martín-López

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ambio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Milena GrossSocial-Ecological Systems Institute, Faculty of Sustainability Science, Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Universitätsallee 1, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany. milena.gross@posteo.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3148-627X
Jasmine PearsonSocial-Ecological Systems Institute, Faculty of Sustainability Science, Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Universitätsallee 1, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany.
Ugo ArbieuSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt am Main, Georg-Voigt-Straße 14, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Maraja RiechersSocial-Ecological Systems Institute, Faculty of Sustainability Science, Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Universitätsallee 1, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany.
Simon ThomsenInstitute of Ecology, Faculty of Sustainability Science, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Universitätsallee 1, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany.
Berta Martín-LópezSocial-Ecological Systems Institute, Faculty of Sustainability Science, Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Universitätsallee 1, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft MA 7670/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the face of biodiversity loss, it is crucial to broaden the arguments for conservation of protected areas by acknowledging diverse values of nature. We systematically reviewed empirical studies to investigate tourists' values of nature in protected areas over time and across regions. To do so, we explored (1) the main ecological and social characteristics of the case studies; (2) methodological approaches; and (3) value types. Based on the review of 152 articles, we found that economic valuation has received the most scientific attention, while socio-cultural valuation approaches have recently increased. Values were primarily elicited and analyzed quantitatively and in monetary metrics, although valuation methods and frameworks have diversified over the past two decades. However, considering the role of valuation methods and frameworks as value-articulating institutions, we suggest that future research on nature valuation also applies qualitative and non-monetary methods, elicits diverse values, and conducts plural valuation.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemBiodiversityInstrumental valueIntergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)Intrinsic valueRelational valueThe Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB)Total Economic Value (TEV)

Identifiers

PMID37071324
PMCPMC10160295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.