Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37071296›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2023

Management of Pathologic Node-Positive Prostate Cancer following Radical Prostatectomy.

Christopher Hayden, Syed Rahman, Soum Lokeshwar, Ankur Choksi, Isaac Y Kim

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher HaydenDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.
Syed RahmanDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.
Soum LokeshwarDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.
Ankur ChoksiDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.
Isaac Y KimDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA. Isaac.kim@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewApproximately 15% of prostate cancer patients have lymph node metastases at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP). However, there is no universally accepted standard of care for these men. The options for treatment in this subset of patients range from observation to a combination of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (aADT) and radiation therapy (RT). RECENT

findingsA recent systematic review showed that there was no clear choice out of the options above to treat these patients. Studies have shown that patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy have lower all-cause mortality when compared to patients treated with salvage radiation therapy. In this review, we summarize treatment options for pathologic node-positive (pN1) patients and discuss the urgent need for robust clinical trials that includes observation as the control group to help establish a standard of care for treating patients with node-positive prostate cancer after RP.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsHumansMaleProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenAndrogen AntagonistsProstate-Specific AntigenAdjuvant androgen deprivation therapyAdjuvant radiation therapyNode-positive prostate cancerObservationpN1 diseaseProstate cancer treatmentSalvage radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID37071296
OpenAlexW4366237942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.