Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37071263›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2023

Cost-Effectiveness of Blinatumomab in Pediatric Patients with High-Risk First-Relapse B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in France.

Megane Caillon, Benoit Brethon, Chrissy van Beurden-Tan, Romain Supiot, Antoine Le Mezo, Jean-Vannak Chauny, Istvan Majer, Arnaud Petit

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02393859 (Phase 3 Trial to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Blinatumomab as Consolidation Therapy Versus Conventional Consolidation Chemotherapy in Pediatric Subjects With HR First Relapse B-precursor ALL), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02393859 phase3completednot on this map

Phase 3 Trial to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Blinatumomab as Consolidation Therapy Versus Conventional Consolidation Chemotherapy in Pediatric Subjects With HR First Relapse B-precursor ALL

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2015 to 2022Enrolled111ConditionsLeukemia, Acute LymphoblasticArmsBlinatumomab, Dexamethasone, Vincrisitne, Daunorubicin, Methotrexate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Megane CaillonAmgen (France) SAS, Arcs de Seine, 18-20 Quai du Point du Jour, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. mcaillon@amgen.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6522-9031
Benoit BrethonPediatric Hematology and Immunology Department, Robert-Debré Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Chrissy van Beurden-TanAmgen (Europe) GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Romain SupiotPutnam PHMR, Paris, France.
Antoine Le MezoAmgen (France) SAS, Arcs de Seine, 18-20 Quai du Point du Jour, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Jean-Vannak ChaunyAmgen (France) SAS, Arcs de Seine, 18-20 Quai du Point du Jour, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Istvan MajerAmgen (Europe) GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Arnaud PetitDepartment of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Armand Trousseau Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Amgen (Switzerland) · CHAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRDuPont (France) · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBased on the results of the phase III randomized 20120215 trial, the European Medicines Agency granted the approval of blinatumomab for the treatment of pediatric patients with high-risk first-relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In France, blinatumomab received reimbursement for this indication in May 2022. This analysis assessed the cost effectiveness of blinatumomab compared with high-risk consolidation chemotherapy (HC3) in this indication from a French healthcare and societal perspective.

methodsA partitioned survival model with three health states (event-free, post-event and death) was developed to estimate life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs over a lifetime horizon. Patients who were alive after 5 years were considered to be cured. An excess mortality rate was applied to capture the late effects of cancer therapy. Utility values were based on the TOWER trial using French tariffs, and cost input data were identified from French national public health sources. The model was validated by clinical experts.

resultsTreatment with blinatumomab over HC3 was estimated to provide gains of 8.39 LYs and 7.16 QALYs. Total healthcare costs for blinatumomab and HC3 were estimated to be €154,326 and €102,028, respectively, resulting in an increment of €52,298. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated to be €7308 per QALY gained from a healthcare perspective. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses, including analysis from the societal perspective.

conclusionsBlinatumomab administered as part of consolidation therapy in pediatric patients with high-risk first-relapsed ALL is cost effective compared with HC3 from the French healthcare and societal perspective.

Indexed as

Acute lymphoblastic leukemiaBlinatumomabCost-effectivenessEconomic evaluationFrancePediatricSocietal perspective

Identifiers

PMID37071263
PMCPMC10333169
OpenAlexW4366240466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.