Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37071254›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2023

Available Systemic Treatments and Emerging Therapies for Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.

Ryan K Rader, Carey K Anders, Nancy U Lin, Sarah L Sammons

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan K RaderDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, 30 Duke Medicine Circle Drive, Box 3841, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Carey K AndersDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, 30 Duke Medicine Circle Drive, Box 3841, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Nancy U LinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Avenue, Yawkey 1250, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Sarah L SammonsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Avenue, Yawkey 1250, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. sarahl_sammons@dfci.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USDuke Cancer InstituteDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementIn 2023, breast cancer brain metastases (BCBrM) remain a major clinical challenge gaining well-deserved attention. Historically managed with local therapies alone, systemic therapies including small molecule inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have shown unprecedented activity in recent trials including patients with brain metastases. These advancements stem from efforts to include patients with stable and active BCBrM in early- and late-phase trial design. Tucatinib added to trastuzumab and capecitabine improves intracranial and extracranial progression-free survival and overall survival in stable and active human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+)-positive brain metastases. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has both shown impressive intracranial activity in stable and active HER2+ BCBrMs challenging historical thinking of ADCs' inability to penetrate the central nervous system (CNS). T-DXd has shown potent activity in HER2-low (immunohistochemistry scores of 1+ or 2+, non-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization) metastatic breast cancer and will be studied in HER2-low BCBrM as well. Novel endocrine therapies including oral selective estrogen downregulators (SERDs) and complete estrogen receptor antagonists (CERANs) are being studied in hormone receptor-positive BCBrM clinical trials due to robust intracranial activity in preclinical models. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) brain metastases continue to portend the worst prognosis of all subtypes. Clinical trials leading to the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors have enrolled few BCBrM patients leading to a lack of understanding of immunotherapies contribution in this subgroup. Data surrounding the use of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in patients with germline BRCA mutation carriers with CNS disease is hopeful. ADCs including those targeting low-level HER2 expression and TROP2 are under active investigation in triple-negative BCBrMs.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsCapecitabineErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePrognosisTrastuzumabCapecitabineErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumabBrain metastasesBreast cancerDrug developmentNovel therapeuticsSystemic therapies

Identifiers

PMID37071254
OpenAlexW4366234878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.