Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37071244›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2023

Novel Diagnostic Techniques in the Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).

Sabrina J Layne, Zachary S Lorsch, Amit Patel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Novel Technique to Diagnose Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabrina J LayneDivision of Gastroenterology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Zachary S LorschDivision of Gastroenterology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Amit PatelDivision of Gastroenterology, Duke University School of Medicine and the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Box 3913, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. amit.patel@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7214-5901
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our present clinical paradigm, patient symptoms and presentation in the setting of traditional findings from endoscopy (erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, reflux-mediated stenosis), esophageal high-resolution manometry, and/or ambulatory reflux monitoring (distal esophageal acid exposure time, numbers of reflux events, reflux-symptom association) guide the care of patients with suspected GERD. However, novel metrics and techniques acquired from or performed at endoscopy, manometry, or pH-impedance monitoring, beyond conventional evaluation, are of great interest to the gastroenterology community given the frequent (and sometimes challenging) presentation of suspected GERD. These novel and evolving diagnostic approaches have the potential to enhance the evaluation of these patients and optimize their management. In this invited review, we discuss the present evidence and potential clinical utility of selected GERD metrics and techniques of interest at endoscopy (dilated intercellular spaces, mucosal impedance), manometry (contractile integral, impedance analysis, straight leg raise, multiple rapid swallow maneuvers), and reflux monitoring (mean nocturnal baseline impedance, post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave indices), and how these tools may be most optimally adopted and utilized for clinical care (Fig. 1).

Indexed as

Barrett EsophagusEsophagitisGastroesophageal RefluxElectric ImpedanceEsophageal pH MonitoringHumansManometryAmbulatory reflux monitoringContractile segment impedanceMean nocturnal baseline impedanceMucosal integritypH-impedance testingPost-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index

Identifiers

PMID37071244
OpenAlexW4366235197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.