ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023
A comparison of short-term outcomes following robotic-assisted vs. open transthoracic diaphragm plication.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-assisted thoracoscopic diaphragmatic plication with absorbable mesh application: surgical technique.Journal of visualized surgery · 2025Article
- Adoption of the Robotic Platform across Thoracic Surgeries.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Raising the bar, lowering the diaphragm: a new era in diaphragmatic plication.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diaphragm paralysis and eventration are rare conditions in adults. Symptomatic patients may benefit from surgical plication of the elevated hemidiaphragm. The objective of this study was to compare short-term outcomes and length of stay following robotic-assisted vs. open diaphragm plication. A multicenter retrospective study was conducted that identified patients undergoing unilateral hemidiaphragm plication from 5/2008 to 12/2020. The first RATS plication was performed in 11/2018. Electronic medical records were reviewed, and outcomes were compared between RATS and open approach. One hundred patients underwent diaphragm plication, including thirty-nine (39.0%) RATS and sixty-one (61.0%) open cases. Patients undergoing RATS diaphragm plication were older (64 years vs. 55 years, p = 0.01) and carried a higher burden of comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index: 2.0 vs. 1.0, p = 0.02). The RATS group had longer median operative times (146 min vs. 99 min, p < 0.01), but shorter median hospital length of stays (3.0 days vs. 6.0 days, p < 0.01). There was a non-significant trend toward a decreased rate of 30-day postoperative complications (20.5% RATS vs. 32.8% open, p = 0.18) and 30-day unplanned readmissions (7.7% RATS vs. 9.8% open, p > 0.99). RATS is a technically feasible and safe option for performing diaphragm plications. This approach increases the surgical candidacy of older patients with a higher burden of comorbid disease without increasing complication rates, while reducing length of hospital stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37071233What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.