Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37071174›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2023

Dietary interventions for pediatric patients with functional abdominal pain disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Can Hua, Yi-Lin Chen, Qing-Feng Tao, Yun-Zhou Shi, Li-Wen Li, Chao-Rong Xie, Min Chen, Zi-Li Zhou, Hui Zheng

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Can HuaThe Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yi-Lin ChenThe Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Qing-Feng TaoThe Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yun-Zhou ShiThe Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Li-Wen LiThe Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Chao-Rong XieThe Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Min ChenColorectal disease department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Zi-Li ZhouDigestive Department, Sichuan Second Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Hui ZhengThe Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China. zhenghui@cdutcm.edu.cn.
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese · CN

Funding

Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program 2021JDTD0007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary therapies are recommended for the treatment of pediatrics with functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs), but the comparative effectiveness among them is unclear. Therefore, the main aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of differential dietary therapies in pediatrics with functional abdominal pain disorders. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to February 28, 2023. Randomized clinical trials of dietary treatments for pediatric patients with functional abdominal pain disorders were included. The primary outcome was the improvement in abdominal pain. The secondary outcomes were changes in pain intensity and pain frequency. Thirty-one studies after screening 8695 retrieved articles were included, and 29 studies were available for network meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, fiber (RR, 4.86; 95%CI, 1.77 to 13.32; P-score = 0.84), synbiotics (RR, 3.92; 95%CI, 1.65 to 9.28; P-score = 0.75), and probiotics (RR, 2.18; 95%CI, 1.46 to 3.26; P-score = 0.46) had significantly larger effect on the improvement in abdominal pain, the three treatments had larger effect than placebo but statistically insignificant in difference in improving pain frequency and intensity. Similarly, there were no significant differences between the dietary treatments after indirect comparisons of the three outcomes.  Conclusion: Fiber supplements, synbiotics, and probiotics were efficacious in improving abdominal pain of FAPDs in children, suggested by very low or low evidence. The evidence of the efficacy of probiotics is more convincing than fiber and synbiotics when sample size and statistical power were considered. No difference in the efficacy of the three treatments. High-quality trials are needed to further investigate the efficacy of dietary interventions. What is Known: • Multiple dietary treatment options are available for functional abdominal pain disorders in the pediatric population, of which the most beneficial one is currently unknown. What is New: • This NMA found very low to low certainty of the evidence suggesting that fiber, synbiotics, and probiotics might be more efficacious in improving abdominal pain of FAPDs in children than the other dietary treatments. • There were no significant differences between active dietary treatments for changes in abdominal pain intensity.

Indexed as

ProbioticsSynbioticsAbdominal PainChildHumansAbdominal painDiet therapyMeta-analysisPediatricsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37071174
OpenAlexW4366235971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.