Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37071167›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Semiautomated segmentation of hepatocellular carcinoma tumors with MRI using convolutional neural networks.

Daniela Said, Guillermo Carbonell, Daniel Stocker, Stefanie Hectors, Naik Vietti-Violi, Octavia Bane, Xing Chin, Myron Schwartz, Parissa Tabrizian, Sara Lewis and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MRI-Based Topology Deep Learning Model for Noninvasive Prediction of Microvascular Invasion and Assisting Prognostic Stratification in HCC.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniela Said *BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Guillermo Carbonell *BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel StockerBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Stefanie HectorsBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Naik Vietti-VioliDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Octavia BaneBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Xing ChinBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Myron SchwartzBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Parissa TabrizianBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Sara LewisBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Hayit GreenspanBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Simon JégouOwkin, Paris, France.
Jean-Baptiste SchirattiOwkin, Paris, France.
Paul JehannoOwkin, Paris, France.
Bachir TaouliBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. bachir.taouli@mountsinai.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6409-1333
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESUniversidad de Los Andes, Chile · CLUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for semiautomated segmentation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors on MRI.

methodsThis retrospective single-center study included 292 patients (237 M/55F, mean age 61 years) with pathologically confirmed HCC between 08/2015 and 06/2019 and who underwent MRI before surgery. The dataset was randomly divided into training (n = 195), validation (n = 66), and test sets (n = 31). Volumes of interest (VOIs) were manually placed on index lesions by 3 independent radiologists on different sequences (T2-weighted imaging [WI], T1WI pre-and post-contrast on arterial [AP], portal venous [PVP], delayed [DP, 3 min post-contrast] and hepatobiliary phases [HBP, when using gadoxetate], and diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]). Manual segmentation was used as ground truth to train and validate a CNN-based pipeline. For semiautomated segmentation of tumors, we selected a random pixel inside the VOI, and the CNN provided two outputs: single slice and volumetric outputs. Segmentation performance and inter-observer agreement were analyzed using the 3D Dice similarity coefficient (DSC).

resultsA total of 261 HCCs were segmented on the training/validation sets, and 31 on the test set. The median lesion size was 3.0 cm (IQR 2.0-5.2 cm). Mean DSC (test set) varied depending on the MRI sequence with a range between 0.442 (ADC) and 0.778 (high b-value DWI) for single-slice segmentation; and between 0.305 (ADC) and 0.667 (T1WI pre) for volumetric-segmentation. Comparison between the two models showed better performance in single-slice segmentation, with statistical significance on T2WI, T1WI-PVP, DWI, and ADC. Inter-observer reproducibility of segmentation analysis showed a mean DSC of 0.71 in lesions between 1 and 2 cm, 0.85 in lesions between 2 and 5 cm, and 0.82 in lesions > 5 cm.

conclusionCNN models have fair to good performance for semiautomated HCC segmentation, depending on the sequence and tumor size, with better performance for the single-slice approach. Refinement of volumetric approaches is needed in future studies. KEY POINTS: • Semiautomated single-slice and volumetric segmentation using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) models provided fair to good performance for hepatocellular carcinoma segmentation on MRI. • CNN models' performance for HCC segmentation accuracy depends on the MRI sequence and tumor size, with the best results on diffusion-weighted imaging and T1-weighted imaging pre-contrast, and for larger lesions.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceCarcinoma, hepatocellularDeep learningMagnetic resonance imagingNeural networks, computer

Identifiers

PMID37071167
OpenAlexW4366240047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.