Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37071123›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2023

Cervical cancer in the pregnant population.

Trinh Nguyen, Stephanie Nougaret, Patricia Castillo, RajMohan Paspulati, Priya Bhosale

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Trinh NguyenBillings Clinic Hospital, 2800 10th Ave N, Billings, MT, 95106, USA. nguyent2@billingsclinic.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4019-3375
Stephanie NougaretInstitute Regional du Cancer Montpellier, EU Euromedicine Park, 208 Av. des Apothicaires, 34090, Montpellier, France.
Patricia CastilloSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
RajMohan PaspulatiMoffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Priya BhosaleMD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the second most encountered cancer in pregnant patients. The 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer updated the staging of primary cervical carcinoma and disease process, with formal incorporation of imaging as a vital source of information in the management process to improve accuracy. Diagnosis and treatment of the pregnant population is a complex interplay of achieving adequate diagnostic information and optimal treatment while minimizing toxicity and risks to the mother and fetus. While novel imaging techniques and anticancer therapies are rapidly developed, much information on the safety and feasibility of different therapies is not yet available in the pregnant population. Therefore, managing pregnant patients with cervical cancer is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm StagingPregnancyTomography, X-Ray ComputedCervical cancerComputed tomographyFIGO 2018Magnetic resonance imagingPregnantUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37071123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.