SynthesisJAMA2023
Skin Cancer Screening: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Synthesis in JAMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of microsimulation models for skin cancer.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing Readability of Skin Cancer Screening Resources: A Comparison of Online Websites and ChatGPT Responses.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Serum free light chain concentration and ratio-based criterion for myeloma-defining event, in its current version, is untenable.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Improving Melanoma Risk Stratification of Skin Color Type by Polygenic Scores of Skin Color and Melanoma.International journal of dermatology · 2026Article
- Harnessing genomics for early cancer detection, risk stratification and prevention.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Diverging Incidence and Mortality of Cutaneous Melanoma in Mainland China, 1990-2023, with Projections to 2030: A Global Burden of Disease 2023 Analysis.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Glucocorticoid Receptor Activation Reprograms NK Cells to Drive AREG-Mediated Immunosuppression: A Pan-Cancer Role for AREG.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Prospective evaluation of an AI-enabled elastic scattering spectroscopy device for triage of patient-identified skin lesions in dermatology clinics.JAAD international · 2025Article
- Improvement of Early Detection of Cutaneous Malignancies and Reduction of Healthcare Costs at Farmers' Markets and a Church in Oklahoma City: A Pilot and Cross-Sectional Study.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Article
- Recurrent pleural effusion: a case of metastatic melanoma 12 years after initial diagnosis.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Stage at Diagnosis of Melanoma Patients: A Retrospective Study.Cancers · 2024Article
- The Prognostic Value of the 31-Gene Expression Profile Test in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2024Review
- Comprehensive Advanced Physicochemical Characterization and In Vitro Human Cell Culture Assessment of BMS-202: A Novel Inhibitor of Programmed Cell Death Ligand.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Awareness of skin cancer screening coverage in U.S. healthcare plans: Is there a need to better educate the public?Preventive medicine reports · 2024Article
- Cancer in People with HIV.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Targeted Screening for Cancer: Learnings and Applicability to Melanoma: A Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Predicting skin cancer risk from facial images with an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) based approach: a proof-of-concept study.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- The Level of Agreement between Self-Assessments and Examiner Assessments of Melanocytic Nevus Counts: Findings from an Evaluation of 4548 Double Assessments.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Skin cancer is the most common cancer type and is a major cause of morbidity. Objective: To systematically review the benefits and harms of screening for skin cancer to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from June 1, 2015, through January 7, 2022; surveillance through December 16, 2022. Study Selection: English-language studies conducted in asymptomatic populations 15 years or older. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently appraised the articles and extracted relevant data from fair- or good-quality studies; results were narratively summarized. Main Outcomes and Measures: Morbidity; mortality; skin cancer stage, precursor lesions, or lesion thickness at detection; harms of screening. Results: Twenty studies in 29 articles were included (N = 6 053 411). Direct evidence on screening effectiveness was from 3 nonrandomized analyses of 2 population-based skin cancer screening programs in Germany (n = 1 791 615) and suggested no melanoma mortality benefit at the population level over 4 to 10 years' follow-up. Six studies (n = 2 935 513) provided inconsistent evidence on the association between clinician skin examination and lesion thickness or stage at diagnosis. Compared with usual care, routine clinician skin examination was not associated with increased detection of skin cancer or precursor lesions (5 studies) or stage at melanoma detection (3 studies). Evidence on the association between clinician skin examination and lesion thickness at detection was inconsistent (3 studies). Nine studies (n = 1 326 051) found a consistent positive association between more advanced stage at melanoma detection and increasing risk of melanoma-associated and all-cause mortality. Two studies (n = 232) found little to no persistent cosmetic or psychosocial harms associated with screening. Conclusions and Relevance: A substantial nonrandomized evidence base suggests a clear association between earlier stage at skin cancer detection and decreased mortality risk. However, nonrandomized studies suggest little to no melanoma mortality benefit associated with skin cancer screening with visual skin examination in adolescents or adults and no association between routine clinician skin examination and earlier stage at melanoma detection. Evidence is inconsistent regarding whether clinician skin examination is associated with thinner melanoma lesions at detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.