Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37070983›Full record

ArticlemSphere2023

Longitudinal Follow-Up of the Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in Health Care Workers in Argentina: Persistence of Humoral Response and Neutralizing Capacity after Sputnik V Vaccination.

Eliana F Castro, Julián Acosta, Lucía Moriena, Mayra Rios Medrano, Malena Tejerina Cibello, Eduardo Codino, Miguel Ángel Taborda, Diego E Álvarez, Ana Laura Cavatorta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eliana F Castro *Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas (IIBIO), Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Julián Acosta *Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario-CONICET, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Lucía MorienaCentro de Tecnología en Salud Pública (CTSP), Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Mayra Rios MedranoInstituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas (IIBIO), Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Malena Tejerina CibelloEscuela de Bio y Nanotecnologías (EByN), Universidad Nacional de San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eduardo CodinoFacultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Miguel Ángel TabordaFacultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Diego E Álvarez *Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas (IIBIO), Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-4449-9670
Ana Laura Cavatorta *Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario-CONICET, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARNational University of Rosario · ARNational University of General San Martín · AR

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación (Agencia I+D+i) Covid Federal SF-10Ministerio de Salud Publica de Santa Fe
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine protection has encountered waning of immune response and breakthrough infections. The hybrid immune response generated by the combination of vaccination and infection was shown to offer higher and broader protection. Here, we present a seroprevalence study of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike/RBD IgG in 1,121 health care workers immunized with Sputnik V and a follow-up of humoral response at 2 and 24 weeks postvaccination (wpv), including neutralizing antibody response (NAT) against ancestral, Gamma, and Delta variants. The first seroprevalence study showed that among 122 individuals with one dose, 90.2% were seropositive versus 99.7% seropositivity among volunteers with the complete two-dose regimen. At 24 wpv, 98.7% of the volunteers remained seropositive, although antibody levels decreased. IgG levels and NAT were higher in individuals that had acquired COVID-19 previous to vaccination than in naive individuals at 2 and 24 wpv. Antibody levels dropped over time in both groups. In contrast, IgG levels and NAT increased after vaccine breakthrough infection. At 2 wpv, 35/40 naive individuals had detectable NAT against SARS-CoV-2 Gamma and 6/40 against Delta. In turn, 8/9 previously infected individuals developed a neutralizing response against SARS-CoV-2 Gamma and 4/9 against Delta variants. NAT against variants followed a trajectory similar to NAT against ancestral SARS-CoV-2, and breakthrough infection led to an increase in NAT and complete seroconversion against variants. In conclusion, Sputnik V-induced humoral response persisted at 6 months postvaccination, and hybrid immunity induced higher levels of anti-S/RBD antibodies and NAT in previously exposed individuals, boosted the response after vaccination, and conferred wider breadth of protection.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralArgentinaBreakthrough InfectionsCOVID-19 VaccinesFollow-Up StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansSeroepidemiologic StudiesVaccinationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 Vaccineshumoral immune responsehybrid immunitySARS-CoV-2Sputnik Vvaccination

Identifiers

PMID37070983
PMCPMC10286708
OpenAlexW4366240186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.