ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Usability of the Surprise Question by Nurses and Patients' Families for Risk Stratification in Emergency Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Surprise Question is an effective tool to identify patients in need of palliative care. But it is unknown whether the Surprise Question can effectively predict adverse outcomes in Emergency patients. Therefor this study is to determine the utility of the modified Surprise Question for risk stratification in emergency patients. And assessed if the modified Surprise Question could be used by different healthcare personnel. Nurses and patients' families were asked to respond as "Yes" or "No" to the modified Surprise Question for each patient. The outcome was resuscitation unit admission. Logistic regression was used to determine covariant significantly associated with resuscitation unit admission. The area under the curve for the second Surprise Question response by nurses was 0.620, which improved to 0.704 when the responses of nurses and patients' families were in agreement. The clinical impression of nurses is a valuable tool to predict altered conditions for medium-acuity patients, and the diagnostic accuracy improves when responses of patients' families and nurses agreed. The clinical impression of nurses is a valuable tool to predict altered conditions for medium-acuity patients, and the diagnostic accuracy improves when responses of patients' families and nurses agreed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.