ArticleNMR in biomedicine2023
Global deep learning optimization of chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance fingerprinting acquisition schedule.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effective Modeling of Continuous WaveMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- An Interpretable Deep-Learning Approach for Efficient CEST Parameter Quantification: Importance-Ranked Saturation Transfer MRI Protocol.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Physics-informed optimization of saturation-transfer MRI protocols using non-differentiable Bloch models.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI for neurodegenerative diseases: An update on clinical and preclinical studies.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Quantitative molecular imaging using deep magnetic resonance fingerprinting.Nature protocols · 2025Review
- Saturation transfer MR fingerprinting for magnetization transfer contrast and chemical exchange saturation transfer quantification.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- CEST MRI data analysis using Kolmogorov-Arnold network (KAN) and Lorentzian-KAN (LKAN) models.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Quantitative multislice and jointly optimized rapid CEST for in vivo whole-brain imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- DCE-Qnet: deep network quantification of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Phase-sensitive deep reconstruction method for rapid multiparametric MR fingerprinting and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2024Article
- Article
- Emerging Trends in Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Quantitative Biomedical Imaging Applications: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The future of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: All-in-one vs. real-time (Part 1).Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024Review
- Dynamic and rapid deep synthesis of chemical exchange saturation transfer and semisolid magnetization transfer MRI signals.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Deep learning for dense Z-spectra reconstruction from CEST images at sparse frequency offsets.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging technique but suffers from long scan times and complicated processing. CEST was recently combined with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) to address these shortcomings. However, the CEST-MRF signal depends on multiple acquisition and tissue parameters so selecting an optimal acquisition schedule is challenging. In this work, we propose a novel dual-network deep learning framework to optimize the CEST-MRF acquisition schedule. The quality of the optimized schedule was assessed in a digital brain phantom and compared with alternate deep learning optimization approaches. The effect of schedule length on the reconstruction error was also investigated. A healthy subject was scanned with optimized and random schedules and with a conventional CEST sequence for comparison. The optimized schedule was also tested in a subject with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reproducibility was assessed via test-retest experiments and the concordance correlation coefficient calculated for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM). The optimized schedule was 12% shorter but yielded equal or lower normalized root mean square error for all parameters. The proposed optimization also provided a lower error compared with alternate methodologies. Longer schedules generally yielded lower error. In vivo maps obtained with the optimized schedule showed reduced noise and improved delineation of GM and WM. CEST curves synthesized from the optimized parameters were highly correlated (r = 0.99) with measured conventional CEST. The mean concordance correlation coefficient in WM/GM for all tissue parameters was 0.990/0.978 for the optimized schedule but only 0.979/0.975 for the random schedule. The proposed schedule optimization is widely applicable to MRF pulse sequences and provides accurate and reproducible tissue maps with reduced noise at a shorter scan time than a randomly generated schedule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.