ReviewClinical endoscopy2023
Single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: a technical review.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Colonoscopy-assisted preplacement of guide tube for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with complex surgically altered anatomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Article
- Anatomical Alterations and Endoscopic Strategies After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Comparison of clinical outcomes for single- and double-balloon enteroscope-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Successful intubation of the periampullary diverticulum in post-Billroth II method-reconstructed intestinal tract using clip-and-snare method with a pre-looping technique.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after Billroth II anastomosis: a comparison of gastroscope and duodenoscope.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Peroral cholangioscopy: past, present and future.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Balloon-assisted ERCP for bile duct stones in surgically altered anatomy: current techniques, devices, and evolving strategies.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Use of short single-balloon enteroscopy in patients with surgically altered anatomy: a single-center experience.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advanced technical tips and recent insights in ERCP using balloon-assisted endoscopy.DEN open · 2024Review
- Simplified single-session EUS-guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal for management of choledocholithiasis in patients with surgically altered anatomy.Gastroenterology report · 2024Article
- Development and evaluation of artificial organ models for ERCP training in patients with surgically altered anatomies.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with surgically altered anatomy is technically challenging. For example, scope insertion, selective cannulation, and intended procedures, such as stone extraction or stent placement, can be difficult. Single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE)-assisted ERCP has been used to effectively and safely address these technical issues in clinical practice. However, the small working channel limits its therapeutic potential. To address this shortcoming, a short-type SBE (short SBE) with a working length of 152 cm and a channel of 3.2 mm diameter has recently been introduced. Short SBE facilitates the use of larger accessories to complete certain procedures, such as stone extraction or self-expandable metallic stent placement. Despite the development in the SBE endoscope, various steps have to be overcome to successfully perform such procedure. To improve success, the challenging factors of each procedure must be identified. At the same time, endoscopists need to be mindful of adverse events, such as perforation, which can arise due to adhesions specific to the surgically altered anatomy. This review discussed technical tips regarding SBE-assisted ERCP in patients with surgically altered anatomy to increase success and reduce the risk of adverse events associated with ERCP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.