Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37070142›Full record

SynthesisClinical rehabilitation2023

Perspectives of health professionals on physical activity and sedentary behaviour in hospitalised adults: A systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Tahlia Alsop, James Woodforde, Ingrid Rosbergen, Niruthikha Mahendran, Sandra Brauer, Sjaan Gomersall

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Physical activity and risk of adverse events in atrial fibrillation: evidence from European and Asian cohorts.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Use of physical activity by occupational therapists and speech-language therapists in KwaZulu-Natal.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tahlia AlsopSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3717-703X
James WoodfordeSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Ingrid RosbergenSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Niruthikha MahendranSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Sandra BrauerSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Sjaan GomersallSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore health professionals' perspectives on physical activity and sedentary behaviour of hospitalised adults to understand factors that contribute to these behaviours in this environment. DATA SOURCES: Five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL) were searched in March 2023. REVIEW

methodsThematic synthesis. Included studies explored perspectives of health professionals on the physical activity and/or sedentary behaviour of hospitalised adults using qualitative methods. Study eligibility was assessed independently by two reviewers and results thematically analysed. Quality was assessed using the McMaster Critical Review Form and confidence in findings assessed using GRADE-CERQual.

resultsFindings from 40 studies explored perspectives of over 1408 health professionals from 12 health disciplines. The central theme identified was that physical activity is not a priority in this setting due to the complex interplay of multilevel influences present in the interdisciplinary inpatient landscape. Subthemes, the hospital is a place for rest, there are not enough resources to make movement a priority, everyone's job is no one's job and policy and leadership drives priorities, supported the central theme. Quality of included studies was variable; critical appraisal scores ranged from 36% to 95% on a modified scoring system. Confidence in findings was moderate to high.

conclusionPhysical activity in the inpatient setting is not a priority, even in rehabilitation units where optimising function is the key. A shift in focus towards functional recovery and returning home may promote a positive movement culture that is supported by appropriate resources, leadership, policy, and the interdisciplinary team.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelSedentary BehaviorAdultExerciseHumanshealth professionalshospitalised adultsinpatient settingPhysical activitysedentary behaviour

Identifiers

PMID37070142
PMCPMC10426259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.