Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37070090›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Coral reef degradation at an atoll of the Western Colombian Caribbean.

Natalia Rivas, Carlos E Gómez, Santiago Millán, Katherine Mejía-Quintero, Luis Chasqui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalia RivasPrograma de Biodiversidad y Ecosistemas Marinos, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras-INVEMAR, Santa Marta, Colombia.
Carlos E GómezPrograma de Biodiversidad y Ecosistemas Marinos, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras-INVEMAR, Santa Marta, Colombia.
Santiago MillánPrograma de Biodiversidad y Ecosistemas Marinos, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras-INVEMAR, Santa Marta, Colombia.
Katherine Mejía-QuinteroPrograma de Biodiversidad y Ecosistemas Marinos, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras-INVEMAR, Santa Marta, Colombia.
Luis ChasquiPrograma de Biodiversidad y Ecosistemas Marinos, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras-INVEMAR, Santa Marta, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral reef decline is an issue of concern around the globe. Remote and uninhabited coral areas are not exempt from facing changes in species composition and functionality due to global drivers. Quitasueño is a remote atoll within the Seaflower Biosphere Reserve, in the Southwestern Caribbean Sea. To evaluate the current status of the coral reefs in Quitasueño we sampled 120 stations through Rapid Ecological Assessment and evaluated four stations through Planar Point Intercept to compare the current percent cover of benthic groups with previous studies in the area. We found pronounced changes in coral and macroalgae covers in time, and great conspicuousness of multiple conditions of deterioration along Quitasueño, including diseases, coral predation, and aggression and invasion of coral colonies by macroalgae and sponges. The reef ecosystem seems to be facing a phase shift, in which the benthic cover previously dominated by hard corals is currently dominated by fleshy macroalgae. It is essential to evaluate the possible drivers of the extent of degradation of Quitasueño to understand the process of deterioration and mitigate the impacts.

Indexed as

AnthozoaSeaweedAnimalsCaribbean RegionColombiaCoral ReefsEcosystemBenthic communityMarine protected areaPhase shiftSeaflower biosphere reserve

Identifiers

PMID37070090
PMCPMC10105559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.