Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37070089›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Comparison of two molecular barcodes for the study of equine strongylid communities with amplicon sequencing.

Élise Courtot, Michel Boisseau, Sophie Dhorne-Pollet, Delphine Serreau, Amandine Gesbert, Fabrice Reigner, Marta Basiaga, Tetiana Kuzmina, Jérôme Lluch, Gwenolah Annonay and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Élise CourtotAnimal Health, UMR1282 Infectiologie et Santé Publique, INRAE, Nouzilly, France.
Michel BoisseauAnimal Health, UMR1282 Infectiologie et Santé Publique, INRAE, Nouzilly, France.
Sophie Dhorne-PolletUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Delphine SerreauAnimal Health, UMR1282 Infectiologie et Santé Publique, INRAE, Nouzilly, France.
Amandine GesbertAnimal Physiology, UEPAO, Institut National de la Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Nouzilly, France.
Fabrice ReignerAnimal Physiology, UEPAO, Institut National de la Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Nouzilly, France.
Marta BasiagaUniversity of Agriculture in Kraków, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7698-1253
Tetiana KuzminaSchmalhausen Institute of Zoology NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Jérôme LluchGeT-PlaGe, Institut National de la Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Toulouse, France.
Gwenolah AnnonayGeT-PlaGe, Institut National de la Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Toulouse, France.
Claire KuchlyGeT-PlaGe, Institut National de la Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8994-550X
Irina DiekmannInstitute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jürgen KrückenInstitute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Georg von Samson-HimmelstjernaInstitute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nuria MachAnimal Health, UMR1225 IHAP, Institut National de la Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Toulouse, France.
Guillaume SalléAnimal Health, UMR1282 Infectiologie et Santé Publique, INRAE, Nouzilly, France.
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRFreie Universität Berlin · DEAgroParisTech · FRSlovak Academy of Sciences · SKUniversity of Agriculture in Krakow · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basic knowledge on the biology and epidemiology of equine strongylid species still needs to be improved to contribute to the design of better parasite control strategies. Nemabiome metabarcoding is a convenient tool to quantify and identify species in bulk samples that could overcome the hurdle that cyathostomin morphological identification represents. To date, this approach has relied on the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) of the ribosomal RNA gene, with a limited investigation of its predictive performance for cyathostomin communities. Using DNA pools of single cyathostomin worms, this study aimed to provide the first elements to compare performances of the ITS-2 and a

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicAnimalsDNA, RibosomalHorsesPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA, RibosomalCyathostominCytochrome c oxidase subunit IHorseInternal transcribed spacer 2MitochondrialNematodeParasiteRibosomalStrongylid

Identifiers

PMID37070089
PMCPMC10105562
OpenAlexW4365146757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.