ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Neural encoding of multiple motion speeds in visual cortical area MT.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Segmenting objects from each other and their background is critical for vision. The speed at which objects move provides a salient cue for segmentation. However, how the visual system represents and differentiates multiple speeds is largely unknown. Here we investigated the neural encoding of multiple speeds of overlapping stimuli in the primate visual cortex. We first characterized the perceptual capacity of human and monkey subjects to segment spatially overlapping stimuli moving at different speeds. We then determined how neurons in the motion-sensitive, middle-temporal (MT) cortex of macaque monkeys encode multiple speeds. We made a novel finding that the responses of MT neurons to two speeds of overlapping stimuli showed a robust bias toward the faster speed component when both speeds were slow (≤ 20°/s). The faster-speed bias occurred even when a neuron had a slow preferred speed and responded more strongly to the slower component than the faster component when presented alone. The faster-speed bias emerged very early in neuronal response and was robust over time and to manipulations of motion direction and attention. As the stimulus speed increased, the faster-speed bias changed to response averaging. Our finding can be explained by a modified divisive normalization model, in which the weights for the speed components are proportional to the responses of a population of neurons elicited by the individual speeds. Our results suggest that the neuron population, referred to as the weighting pool, includes neurons that have a broad range of speed preferences. As a result, the response weights for the speed components are determined by the stimulus speeds and invariant to the speed preferences of individual neurons. Our findings help to define the neural encoding rule of multiple stimuli and provide new insight into the underlying neural mechanisms. The faster-speed bias would benefit behavioral tasks such as figure-ground segregation if figural objects tend to move faster than the background in the natural environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.