Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37070051›Full record

ReviewMovement disorders clinical practice2023

Chromosome Microarray Analysis for the Investigation of Deletions in Pediatric Movement Disorders: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Luca Soliani, Adrián Alcalá San Martín, Sol Balsells, Cristina Hernando-Davalillo, Juan Darío Ortigoza-Escobar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Unravelling the Global Tapestry of Genetic Ataxias: Epidemiology and Genetic Testing Approaches.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Long-Read Sequencing: The Third Generation of Diagnostic Testing for Dystonia.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Luca SolianiIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna UOC Neuropsichiatria dell'età Pediatrica Bologna Italy.
Adrián Alcalá San MartínDepartment of Genetic and Molecular Medicine and Pediatric Institute of Rare Diseases Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
Sol BalsellsDepartment of Statistics Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Spain.
Cristina Hernando-DavalilloDepartment of Genetic and Molecular Medicine and Pediatric Institute of Rare Diseases Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
Juan Darío Ortigoza-EscobarU-703 Centre for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER) Instituto de Salud Carlos III Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6320-2641
Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de DéuIstituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · IT

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) can detect copy number variants (CNV) beyond the resolution of standard G-banded karyotyping. De novo or inherited microdeletions may cause autosomal dominant movement disorders. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, associated features, and genetic information of children with deletions in known genes that cause movement disorders and to make recommendations regarding the diagnostic application of CMA. Methods: Clinical cases published in English were identified in scientific databases (PubMed, ClinVar, and DECIPHER) from January 1998 to July 2019 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Cases with deletions or microdeletions greater than 300 kb were selected. Information collected included age, sex, movement disorders, associated features, and the size and location of the deletion. Duplications or microduplications were not included. Results: A total of 18.097 records were reviewed, and 171 individuals were identified. Ataxia (30.4%), stereotypies (23.9%), and dystonia (21%) were the most common movement disorders. A total of 16% of the patients demonstrated more than one movement disorder. The most common associated features were intellectual disability or developmental delay (78.9%) and facial dysmorphism (57.8%). The majority (77.7%) of microdeletions were smaller than 5 Mb. We find no correlation between movement disorders, their associated features, and the size of microdeletions. Conclusions: Our results support the use of CMA as an investigational test in children with movement disorders. As the majority of identified articles were case reports and small case series (low quality), future efforts should focus on larger prospective studies to examine the causation of microdeletions in pediatric movement disorders.

Indexed as

childrenchromosome microarray analysisdeletionmovement disorderreview

Identifiers

PMID37070051
PMCPMC10105116
OpenAlexW4323045096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.