Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37069969›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2023

Patients' Perspectives, Factors, and Patterns of eHealth Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

James Tang, Martin Howell, Vincent W Lee, Chandana Guha, Amanda Dominello, Simon Roger, Karen Keung, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Allison Tong, Germaine Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James TangSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Martin HowellSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Vincent W LeeSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Chandana GuhaSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Amanda DominelloSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Simon RogerRenal Research, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia.
Karen KeungPrince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Armando Teixeira-PintoSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Allison TongSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Germaine WongSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: eHealth supports the delivery of relevant health information and management of chronic disease. However, little is known about patients' perspectives and the determinants of eHealth use among kidney transplant recipients. Methods: Kidney transplant recipients aged 18 years and older from 3 transplant units in Australia and the Better Evidence and Translation in Chronic Kidney Disease consumer network completed a survey with free-text responses relating to eHealth uptake. Multivariable regression modeling was used to determine the factors associated with eHealth use. Free-text responses were thematically analyzed. Results: Of the 117 participants who were invited in person and who responded to the email, 91 completed the survey. Sixty-three participants (69%) were current eHealth users (active use of eHealth tools), and 91% had access to eHealth devices, including smartphones (81%) and computers (59%). Most (98%) reported that eHealth improves posttransplant care. Factors associated with increased eHealth use (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) were higher eHealth literacy scale (eHEALS) score (1.21 [1.06-1.38]) and tertiary education (7.78 [2.19-27.7]). We identified the following 3 themes on eHealth determinants: (i) empowering self-management, (ii) enhancing health services, and (iii) technology burden. Conclusions: Transplant recipients believe that eHealth interventions have the potential to improve their posttransplant care. eHealth interventions should meet the needs of all transplant recipients and be accessible to those with lower educational attainment.

Indexed as

digital healtheHealthtransplant

Identifiers

PMID37069969
PMCPMC10105051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.