ArticleInternational journal of women's health2023
Clinical Analysis and Prognostic Prediction Model for Patients with Uterine Leiomyosarcoma at FIGO Stage I.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological Predictors of Recurrence in Uterine Sarcomas-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Identification and validation of prognostic genes associated with T-cell exhaustion and macrophage polarization in breast cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To reveal the clinical status and construct a predictive prognostic model for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) at International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I. Patients and Methods: The medical records of patients with stage I uLMS during the study period were retrospectively reviewed. Multiple imputation, Martingale residuals and restricted cubic spline were used for data processing. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors. The Schoenfeld individual test was used to verify the proportional hazards (PH) assumption. The predictive ability of the nomogram was validated internally. Results: Ultimately, 102 patients were included. The median age at diagnosis was 51 years old. During the medium follow-up time of 68 months, 55 (53.9%) patients developed recurrence. The median recurrence interval was 32 months. The most common metastatic site was the lung (27 cases). Eventually, 38 (37.3%) patients died of uLMS. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 66.0% and 52.0%, respectively. Age at diagnosis >49 years, larger tumor size, MI>10/10HPF, presence of LVSI and Ki-67 labeling index (LI) >25% (P=0.0467, 0.0077, 0.0475, 0.0294, and 0.0427, respectively) were independent prognostic factors. The PH assumption remained inviolate. The concordance index was 0.847, the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve surpassed 0.7, and the calibration curve showed gratifying consistency. Conclusion: Age at diagnosis, tumor size, MI, LVSI, and Ki-67 LI were identified as independent prognostic factors for stage I uLMS. This prognostic nomogram would provide personalized assessment with superior predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.