ArticleCureus2023
Uncorrected Refractive Errors Among Children Attending Pediatric Ophthalmology Clinic at Security Forces Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Refractive Error Patterns and the Impact of Cycloplegia in Ametropic Children and Adolescents in Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia.Clinical optometry · 2026Article
- Challenges faced by visually impaired individuals from the perspective of faculty members: a phenomenological study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRefractive errors are globally one of the most prevalent ocular disorders among pediatrics. This study aimed to determine the pattern of uncorrected refractive errors among children attending pediatric ophthalmology clinics at Security Forces Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort clinic-based study including the records of children attending the pediatric ophthalmology clinic at Security Forces Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia, between July 2021 and July 2022 who were diagnosed with refractive errors, ages between 4 and 14 years.
resultsA total of 114 patients were included in the study while 26 patients with other ocular disorders were excluded from the study. The mean age of children included in the study was 9.1 ± 2.9. The most prevalent refractive errors were hyperopic astigmatism (64%), followed by myopic astigmatism (28.1%), then myopia (5.3%), and hyperopia (2.6%). The overall uncorrected refractive error of this study was estimated to be 36%. No significant association was found between the factors of age and gender on the type of refractive errors (P-value > 0.05).
conclusionThe most prevalent pattern of uncorrected refractive errors among children attending pediatric ophthalmology clinics at Security Forces Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia was hyperopic astigmatism followed by myopic astigmatism. No differences were found between different age groups and between genders on the type of refractive errors. Implementation of adequate vision screening programs for school-aged children is essential to detect uncorrected refractive errors at an early age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.