Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37069609›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2023

The effect of gabapentin and pregabalin administration on memory in clinical and preclinical studies: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Zahra Behroozi, Maral Jafarpour, Maryam Razmgir, Sepideh Saffarpour, Hanieh Azizi, Ali Kheirandish, Tahereh Kosari-Rad, Fatemeh Ramezni, Atousa Janzadeh

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Zahra BehrooziPhysiology Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Maral JafarpourThe International Campus of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam RazmgirDepartment of Medical Library and Information Sciences, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sepideh SaffarpourDepartment of Microbiology, Shahr-E-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Hanieh AziziMedical University of Pécs Hungary, Pécs, Hungary.
Ali KheirandishDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Tahereh Kosari-RadRadiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh RamezniPhysiology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ramezani.f@iums.ac.ir.
Atousa JanzadehRadiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. janzadeh.at@iums.ac.ir.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University, Shahr-e-Qods Branch · IRKerman University of Medical Sciences · IRMazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToday, gabapentinoids such as Gabapentin (GBP) and pregabalin (PGB) are widely used as painkillers. This may alter the function of the nervous system; hence their results may include a difference in memory and processes that end in memory formation. This study aims to conclude whether gabapentinoids can alter memory or not by reviewing and analyzing clinical and preclinical studies. MATERIAL AND

methodsA comprehensive search was carried out in databases including PUBMED, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. In the included studies, memory was measured as an outcome variable in clinical or preclinical studies.

resultA total of 21 articles (4 clinical, 17 preclinical) were included in the meta-analysis by STATA Software. The results showed that memory changes under the influence of GBP. Both the administrated dosage and the time of administration are important in the final results and latency time of retention. GBP administration in healthy animals increased latency time, whereas if the administration of GBP took place exactly before training, the latency time increased slightly. Short-term administration of PGB in healthy volunteers is accompanied by transient side effects on the CNS. However, the number and homogeneity of the studies were not such that a meta-analysis could be performed on them.

conclusionClinical and preclinical studies showed that PGB administration did not confirm its improving memory effect. GBP administration in healthy animals increased latency time and improved memory. Although it depended on the time of administration.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnimalsGabapentinPregabalinAnalgesicsGabapentinPregabalinGabapentinMemoryPainPregabalin

Identifiers

PMID37069609
PMCPMC10111701
OpenAlexW4366205802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.