Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37069593›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2023

Experiences of patients at high risk of opioid overdose accessing emergency department and behavioral health interventions: a qualitative analysis in an urban emergency department.

Alexandra B Collins, Janette Baird, Evelyn Nimaja, Yokabed Ashenafi, Melissa A Clark, Francesca L Beaudoin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03684681 (The Navigator Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03684681 nacompletednot on this map

The Navigator Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRhode Island HospitalRan2018 to 2022Enrolled650ConditionsOpioid Use, Opioid Dependence, Opioid Abuse, Opioid-Related DisordersArmsPeer Navigator Intervention, Social Work Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Peer support for patients with opioid use disorder in the emergency department: A narrative review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra B CollinsDepartment of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S Main Street, Providence, RI, USA.
Janette BairdDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Warrant Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 55 Claverick Street 2Nd Floor, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Evelyn NimajaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Warrant Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 55 Claverick Street 2Nd Floor, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Yokabed AshenafiDepartment of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S Main Street, Providence, RI, USA.
Melissa A ClarkDepartment of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Francesca L BeaudoinDepartment of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S Main Street, Providence, RI, USA. francesca_beaudoin@brown.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency Departments (EDs) have become critical 'touchpoints' for the identification and early engagement of patients at risk of overdose or who have an opioid use disorder (OUD). Our objectives were to examine patients' ED experiences, identify barriers and facilitators of service uptake in ED settings, and explore patients' experiences with ED staff.

methodsThis qualitative study was part of a randomized controlled trial that evaluated the effectiveness of clinical social workers and certified peer recovery specialists in increasing treatment uptake and reducing opioid overdose rates for people with OUD. Between September 2019 and March 2020, semi-structured interviews were conducted 19 participants from the trial. Interviews sought to assess participants' ED care experiences across intervention type (i.e., clinical social worker or peer recovery specialist). Participants were purposively sampled across intervention arm (social work, n = 11; peer recovery specialist, n = 7; control, n = 1). Data were analyzed thematically with a focus on participant experiences in the ED and social and structural factors shaping care experiences and service utilization.

resultsParticipants reported varied ED experiences, including instances of discrimination and stigma due to their substance use. However, participants underscored the need for increased engagement of people with lived experience in ED settings, including the use of peer recovery specialists. Participants highlighted that ED provider interactions were critical drivers of shaping care and service utilization and needed to be improved across EDs to improve post-overdose care.

conclusionsWhile the ED provides an opportunity to reach patients at risk of overdose, our results demonstrate how ED-based interactions and service provision can impact ED care engagement and service utilization. Modifications to care delivery may improve experiences for patients with OUD or at high risk for overdose.

trial registrationClinical trial registration: NCT03684681.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidEmergency Service, HospitalHumansQualitative ResearchAnalgesics, OpioidEmergency departmentHarm reductionOverdosePeer workerSocial worker

Identifiers

PMID37069593
PMCPMC10110343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.