Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2023
Clinical outcomes of bilateral implantation of new generation monofocal IOL enhanced for intermediate distance and conventional monofocal IOL in a Korean population.
Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of visual outcomes of enhanced monofocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Visual and patient-reported outcomes of an enhanced versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Realistic Visual Acuity and Patient Satisfaction After Simultaneous Bilateral Tecnis Eyhance DIB00 Monofocal Plus Lens Implantation During a 12-Month Follow-Up Period in a Single-Center Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Comparison of visual performance between three enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses under different refractive targets.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Monofocal intraocular lens based on the Bessel principle for improved intermediate vision: a comparative assessment.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- A comparative study and review of visual outcomes with enhanced versus standard monofocal intraocular lenses following cataract surgery.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025Article
- Enhanced Monofocal IOLs Improve Patient Satisfaction in Phaco-Vitrectomy for ERM.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Outcomes of mini-monovision with monofocal, enhanced monofocal and extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Comparison of visual acuity and optical quality between higher-order aspheric monofocal and standard introcular lenses.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes of an Enhanced and Conventional Monofocal IOL in Patients with Early and Intermediate Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Comparison of bilateral implantation of monofocal intraocular lenses with enhanced intermediate function targeting with - 2.00 D and emmetropia in moderate to high myopic Asian patients.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2024Article
- Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Phacovitrectomy for Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- [Optical benchtop evaluation of special intraocular lens optics].Die Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Ocular parameters associated with visual performance of enhanced monofocal intraocular lens.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- A comparative study of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses combining bifocal and extended depth-of-focus profiles.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a New Enhanced Monofocal IOL and a Conventional Monofocal IOL.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Short-term clinical outcomes after implantation of monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function in eyes with epiretinal membrane.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Clinical Performance of New Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses: Comparison of Hydrophobic C-loop and Hydrophilic Plate-Haptic Platform.Advances in therapy · 2023Article
- Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of Enhanced and Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantations in Eyes with Early Glaucoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical Results and Factors Affecting Visual Function in Eyes Implanted with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo compare the clinical outcomes of bilateral implantation of enhanced intermediate function intraocular lenses (IOLs) and standard monofocal IOLs.
methodsIn this prospective, randomized, comparative controlled study, we compared the visual outcomes of patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery at the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, with either enhanced monofocal IOLs (Tecnis Eyhance, ICB00, Johnson and Johnson Vision Care, Inc) (Group 1) or standard monofocal IOLs (Tecnis, ZCB00, Johnson and Johnson Vision Care, Inc) (Group 2). The assessment included monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate (UIVA at 60 cm) and near (UNVA at 40 cm) visual acuity, uncorrected defocus curves, contrast sensitivity testing (CST), and reading speed test using Quality of vision was evaluated using the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25).
resultsAt 3-months postoperatively, monocular and binocular outcomes of UIVA and UNVA were statistically significantly better in Group 1 (P < 0.05). The binocular uncorrected defocus curve of Group 1 showed statistically significantly better outcomes at vergence ranges of -1.5 to -4.0 D (P < 0.05). Significantly higher reading speed test was also observed in Group 1 in all ranges tested (1.0 to 0.1 LogMAR) (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in CST between groups.
conclusionsBilateral implantation of enhanced monofocal IOLs provided better vision at intermediate and near distances compared to standard monofocal IOLs, while maintaining good distance vision and contrast sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.