Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37069540›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

Genealyzer: web application for the analysis and comparison of gene expression data.

Kristina Lietz, Babak Saremi, Lena Wiese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristina LietzResearch Group Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer ITEM, Hannover, Germany.
Babak SaremiResearch Group Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer ITEM, Hannover, Germany.
Lena WieseResearch Group Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer ITEM, Hannover, Germany. lena.wiese@item.fraunhofer.de.

Funding

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Attract 042-601000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene expression profiling is a widely adopted method in areas like drug development or functional gene analysis. Microarray data of gene expression experiments is still commonly used and widely available for retrospective analyses. However, due to to changes of the underlying technologies data sets from different technologies are often difficult to compare and thus a multitude of already available data becomes difficult to use. We present a web application that abstracts away mathematical and programmatical details in order to enable a convenient and customizable analysis of microarray data for large-scale reproducibility studies. In addition, the web application provides a feature that allows easy access to large microarray repositories.

resultsOur web application consists of three basic steps which are necessary for a differential gene expression analysis as well as Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and the comparison of multiple analysis results. Genealyzer can handle Affymetrix data as well as one-channel and two-channel Agilent data. All steps are visualized with meaningful plots. The application offers flexible analysis while being intuitively operable.

conclusionsOur web application provides a unified platform for analysing microarray data, while allowing users to compare the results of different technologies and organisms. Beyond reproducibility, this also offers many possibilities for gaining further insights from existing study data, especially since data from different technologies or organisms can also be compared. The web application can be accessed via this URL: https://genealyzer.item.fraunhofer.de/ . Login credentials can be found at the end.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSoftwareGene ExpressionInternetOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesGene expressionMicroarrayWebapplication

Identifiers

PMID37069540
PMCPMC10111666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.