Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37069534›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023

Facilitating deep learning through preprocessing of optical coherence tomography images.

Anfei Li, James P Winebrake, Kyle Kovacs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anfei LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 1305 York Ave 11th floor, New York, NY, 10021, USA. anl2038@med.cornell.edu.
James P WinebrakeDepartment of Ophthalmology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 1305 York Ave 11th floor, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Kyle KovacsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1305 York Ave 11th floor, New York, NY, 10021, USA. kyk9011@med.cornell.edu.
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USWeill Cornell Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile deep learning has delivered promising results in the field of ophthalmology, the hurdle to complete a deep learning study is high. In this study, we aim to facilitate small scale model trainings by exploring the role of preprocessing to reduce computational burden and accelerate learning.

methodsA small subset of a previously published dataset containing optical coherence tomography images of choroidal neovascularization, drusen, diabetic macula edema, and normal macula was modified using Fourier transformation and bandpass filter, producing high frequency images, original images, and low frequency images. Each set of images was trained with the same model, and their performances were compared.

resultsCompared to that with the original image dataset, the model trained with the high frequency image dataset achieved an improved final performance and reached maximum performance much earlier (in fewer epochs). The model trained with low frequency images did not achieve a meaningful performance.

conclusionAppropriate preprocessing of training images can accelerate the training process and can potentially facilitate modeling using artificial intelligence when limited by sample size or computational power.

Indexed as

Deep LearningTomography, Optical CoherenceAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansRetinaDeep learningMachine learningOptical coherence tomographyPreprocessing

Identifiers

PMID37069534
PMCPMC10108538
OpenAlexW4366189531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.