ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023
Facilitating deep learning through preprocessing of optical coherence tomography images.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Segmentation-Guided Preprocessing Improves Deep Learning Diagnostic Accuracy and Confidence of Ameloblastoma and Odontogenic Keratocyst in Cone Beam CT Images-A Preliminary Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrating Retinal Segmentation Metrics with Machine Learning for Predictions from Mouse SD-OCT Scans.Current eye research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile deep learning has delivered promising results in the field of ophthalmology, the hurdle to complete a deep learning study is high. In this study, we aim to facilitate small scale model trainings by exploring the role of preprocessing to reduce computational burden and accelerate learning.
methodsA small subset of a previously published dataset containing optical coherence tomography images of choroidal neovascularization, drusen, diabetic macula edema, and normal macula was modified using Fourier transformation and bandpass filter, producing high frequency images, original images, and low frequency images. Each set of images was trained with the same model, and their performances were compared.
resultsCompared to that with the original image dataset, the model trained with the high frequency image dataset achieved an improved final performance and reached maximum performance much earlier (in fewer epochs). The model trained with low frequency images did not achieve a meaningful performance.
conclusionAppropriate preprocessing of training images can accelerate the training process and can potentially facilitate modeling using artificial intelligence when limited by sample size or computational power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.