Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37069511›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2023

Quantitative CT screening improved lumbar BMD evaluation in older patients compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Wentao Lin, Chaoqin He, Faqin Xie, Tao Chen, Guanghao Zheng, Houjie Yin, Haixiong Chen, Zhiyun Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Thoracolumbar vertebral bone quality (TLVBQ) score as a possible screening tool for osteoporosis in patients with severe degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Comparison of the value of VBQ scores for assessing abnormal bone mass based on DXA and QCT.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion with lateral plating: techniques, feasibility and efficacy.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Predictive efficacy of phantom-less calibration of computed tomography for cage subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wentao LinDepartment of Spine Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Chaoqin HeDepartment of Spine Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Faqin XieDepartment of Spine Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Tao ChenDepartment of Spine Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Guanghao ZhengDepartment of Spine Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Houjie YinDepartment of Spine Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Haixiong ChenDepartment of Radiology and Image, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Zhiyun WangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China. dragon201@126.com.
The First People's Hospital of Shunde · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobust evidence on whether diagnostic discordance exists between lumbar osteoporosis detected by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) vs. dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is still lacking. In this study involving a relatively large prospective cohort of older men (aged > 60 years) and postmenopausal women, we assessed lumbar QCT-derived volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and DXA-derived area BMD and evaluated their predictive performance for prevalent vertebral fracture (VF).

methodsA total of 501 patients who underwent spinal surgery from September 2020 to September 2022 were enrolled. The criteria recommended by the American College of Radiology and the World Health Organization were used for lumbar osteoporosis diagnosis. The osteoporosis detection rates between QCT and DXA were compared. QCT-vBMD was plotted against the DXA T score, and the line of best fit was calculated based on linear regression. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the associations between risk factors and VF. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed, and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

resultsQCT screening showed that 60.7% of patients had osteoporosis, whereas DXA screening showed that 50.7% of patients had osteoporosis. Diagnoses were concordant for 325 (64.9%) patients. In all, 205 patients suffered a VF of at least one anatomic level. Of these, 84.4% (173/205) were diagnosed with osteoporosis by QCT, while only 73.2% (150/205) were diagnosed by DXA. Multivariate logistic regression showed that osteoporosis detected by QCT exhibited a stronger relationship with VF than that detected by DXA (unadjusted OR, 6.81 vs. 5.04; adjusted OR, 3.44 vs. 2.66). For discrimination between patients with and without VF, QCT-vBMD (AUC = 0.802) showed better performance than DXA T score (AUC = 0.76).

conclusionIn older patients undergoing spinal surgery, QCT-vBMD is more helpful than DXA in terms of osteoporosis detection rate and prediction of patients with prevalent VFs.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisSpinal FracturesAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedBone DensityFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone mineral densityDual X-ray absorptiometryLumbar osteoporosisQuantitative computed tomographyVertebral fracture

Identifiers

PMID37069511
PMCPMC10108496
OpenAlexW4366189553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.