Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37069465›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2023

A robust walking detection algorithm using a single foot-worn inertial sensor: validation in real-life settings.

Gaëlle Prigent, Kamiar Aminian, Andrea Cereatti, Francesca Salis, Tecla Bonci, Kirsty Scott, Claudia Mazzà, Lisa Alcock, Silvia Del Din, Eran Gazit and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gaëlle PrigentLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement (LMAM), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. gaelle.prigent@epfl.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-4054
Kamiar AminianLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement (LMAM), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andrea CereattiDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico Di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Francesca SalisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Tecla BonciDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Insigneo Institute for in Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Kirsty ScottDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Insigneo Institute for in Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Claudia MazzàDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Insigneo Institute for in Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Lisa AlcockTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Silvia Del DinTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Eran GazitCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Clint HansenDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Anisoara Paraschiv-IonescuLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement (LMAM), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mobilise-D consortium

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Walking activity and gait parameters are considered among the most relevant mobility-related parameters. Currently, gait assessments have been mainly analyzed in laboratory or hospital settings, which only partially reflect usual performance (i.e., real world behavior). In this study, we aim to validate a robust walking detection algorithm using a single foot-worn inertial measurement unit (IMU) in real-life settings. We used a challenging dataset including 18 individuals performing free-living activities. A multi-sensor wearable system including pressure insoles, multiple IMUs, and infrared distance sensors (INDIP) was used as reference. Accurate walking detection was obtained, with sensitivity and specificity of 98 and 91% respectively. As robust walking detection is needed for ambulatory monitoring to complete the processing pipeline from raw recorded data to walking/mobility outcomes, a validated algorithm would pave the way for assessing patient performance and gait quality in real-world conditions.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingAlgorithmsFootHumansMonitoring, AmbulatoryAdaptive thresholdContinuous wavelet transformFoot-worn sensorReal-worldWalking detection

Identifiers

PMID37069465
PMCPMC10412496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.