ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2023
Pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis with usual interstitial pneumonia.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical significance of radiological usual interstitial pneumonia pattern in primary Sjögren syndrome-associated interstitial lung disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Unraveling the pleiotropic effects of CCR2-dependent signal transduction in fibrosis development.Theranostics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retrospective study comparing pulmonary hypertension risk in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and non-SSc interstitial lung disease patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). Retrospective analysis of 144 interstitial lung disease patients, 53 SSc (32 UIP and 21 NSIP) and 91 non-SSc (47 UIP and 44 NSIP). Pulmonary hypertension was diagnosed as pulmonary systolic artery pressure (PAPs) > 25 mmHg. All SSc and non-SSc patients with pulmonary hypertension were classified WHO Group 3. Pulmonary hypertension was identified in 21/32 (65.6%), 9/21 (42.8%), 14/47 (29.7%), and 28/44 (45.4%) SSc-UIP, SSc-NSIP, control-UIP, and control-NSIP groups, respectively. PAPs mean of SSc-UIP group was higher than control-UIP group (32.6 ± 9.8 vs 28.5 ± 6.6, p-value = 0.02). PAPs mean of SSc-NSIP group was lower than control-NSIP group (27.0 ± 7.1 vs 33.9 ± 8.8, p = 0.002). Frequency of patients with PAP > 25 mmHg in SSc-UIP group was 60% higher in comparison to control-UIP (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.51-5.16) and SSc-NSIP (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 0.45-5.70) groups. Logistic regression analysis estimating the linear trend per ten-unit increase in PAPs levels demonstrated an increment for the SSc-UIP group compared to the control-UIP (OR = 2.64, 95% CI 1.25-5.58, p = 0.01) and the control-NSIP (OR = 6.34, 95% CI 2.82-14.3, p < 0.001) groups. The case-control study confirms that pulmonary hypertension is frequently found in SSc patients and demonstrates, for the first time, a significant increased risk of pulmonary hypertension among SSc-UIP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.