ArticleIrish journal of medical science2023
Motives behind low-acuity geriatric emergency medicine attenders: a picture from free healthcare system.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences of caregivers of patients with noncancer diseases readmitted to an emergency department at the end of life.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Emergency care in Brazil: factors leading to clinically inappropriate use of emergency care among young adult users in the Brazilian context.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent evidence about the low-acuity ED visits of old patients has been generated in various healthcare systems; however, this is not a well-researched area in middle-income countries by patients' perspectives.
methodsA study of 231 patients attending the ED of a tertiary public hospital was conducted using a structured questionnaire from June to August 2021. Eligible patients were community-dwelling, aged > 65 years, who presented with lower clinical urgency. The questionnaire tool was developed using questions from available studies on health service utilization. Additional commentary was obtained from the patients regarding on the reasons for attending the ED and was administered on weekdays between 8:00 am and 5:30 pm.
resultsThe study included 221 patients over 65 years of age, with a mean age of 72.21 ± 4.2. A total of 58.4% of the patients thought that they should be examined urgently, 15.4% had symptoms that had lasted more than one month, and 59% requested emergency imaging. Patients preferred the ED via treatment, imaging, transportation opportunities of emergency department, past negative experiences, and access problems with family medicines or appointment problems with specialist outpatient clinics with expectations of continuity of care.
conclusionOld individuals have unique healthcare needs, and the motives behind this group of patients with low-acuity problems to apply to the ED is complex. As one of the key objectives of healthcare policies is to make sure that patients are assessed at proper time and place, studies that consider patient perspectives might lead to accurate conclusions for this aim.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37069379What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.