Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37069372›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2023

Minimally invasive approach to incisional hernia in elective and emergency surgery: a SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies) and ISHAWS (Italian Society of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery) online survey.

Lorenzo Crepaz, Alberto Sartori, Mauro Podda, Monica Ortenzi, Alberto Di Leo, Cesare Stabilini, Michele Carlucci, Stefano Olmi, SICE/ISHAWS collaborative group

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lorenzo CrepazGeneral and Mini-Invasive Surgery, San Camillo Hospital, Via Giovanelli 19, 38122, Trento, Italy. lorenzo.crepaz1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7918-7212
Alberto SartoriDepartment of General Surgery, Ospedale Di Montebelluna, Via Palmiro Togliatti, 16, 31044, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy.
Mauro PoddaDepartment of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Monica OrtenziDepartment of General Surgery, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Piazza Roma 22, 60121, Ancona, Italy.
Alberto Di LeoGeneral and Mini-Invasive Surgery, San Camillo Hospital, Via Giovanelli 19, 38122, Trento, Italy.
Cesare StabiliniDISC (Department of Surgical Sciences), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Michele CarlucciGeneral and Emergency Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Stefano OlmiOncologic Surgery, Policlinico San Marco GSD, Zingonia (Bg), Corso Europa 7, 24040, Zingonia, Bg, Italy.
SICE/ISHAWS collaborative group
IRCCS San Camillo Hospital · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive abdominal wall surgery is growing worldwide, with a constant and fast improvement of surgical techniques and surgeons' confidence in treating both primary and incisional hernias (IH). The Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies (SICE) and the ISHAWS (Italian Society of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery) worked together to investigate state of the art in IH treatment in elective and emergency settings in Italy. An online open survey was designed, and Italian surgeons interested in abdominal wall surgery were invited to fill out a 20-point questionnaire on IH surgical procedures performed in their departments. Surgeons were asked to express their points of view on specific questions about technical and clinical variables in IH treatment. Preferred approach in elective IH surgery was minimally invasive (59.7%). Open surgery was the preferred approach in 40.3% of the responses. In emergency settings, open surgery was the preferred approach (65.4%); however, 34.5% of the involved surgeons declare to prefer the laparoscopic/endoscopic approach. Most respondents opted for conversion to open surgery in case of relevant surgical field contamination, with a non-mesh repair of abdominal wall defects. Among those that used the laparoscopic approach in the emergent setting, the majority (74%) used the size of the defect of 5 cm as a decisional cut-off. The spread of minimally invasive approaches to IH repair in emergency surgery in Italy is gaining relevance. Code-sharing through scientific societies can improve clinical practice in different departments and promote a tailored approach to IH surgery.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallHernia, VentralIncisional HerniaLaparoscopyHerniorrhaphyHumansSurgical MeshEmergencyIncisional herniaLaparoscopyMeshSurvey

Identifiers

PMID37069372
OpenAlexW4366131803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.