ReviewNature medicine2023
Consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions.
Review in Nature medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- SAGES 2025 guidelines for fluorescence image-guided gastrointestinal surgery using indocyanine green.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Guideline
- Efficacy of Er:YAG laser in removal of impacted mandibular third molars (a randomized controlled clinical trial).BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Article
- Perioperative cardiac safety of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy: how neutral is neutral?International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Competency, Proficiency, and Mastery: Learning Curves for Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy at 16 International Expert Centers.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- Cohort profile: PeRiOperative sTress risk assEssment and Clinical decision cohorT (PROTECT), a multi-center observational study based on real-world data.BMC geriatrics · 2026Observational
- Dynamic machine learning model integrating resting energy expenditure for predicting postoperative complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Global evolution of robot-assisted spine surgery: a bibliometric and knowledge-mapping study (1997-2026).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- A programmable bioresorbable electrochemical microneedle sensor array for perioperative monitoring of organ health.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Outcome reporting for liver transplantation machine perfusion studies: a systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Impact of seamless intervention in the operating room combined with pain management on the efficiency of urological laparoscopic surgery.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025Article
- AI-based neoadjuvant immunotherapy response prediction across pan-cancer: a comprehensive review.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Global benchmarks for minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for cancer.The British journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Cystic tumors of the pancreas: Current perspectives on diagnosis and management.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Implementing clinical needs into the development of wearable health-monitoring technology.Nature nanotechnology · 2025Article
- Long-term risk of venous thromboembolism following hip or knee replacement surgery: a population-based matched cohort study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Preliminary Outcomes of a Digital Remote Care Solution for Colorectal Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2025Article
- Virtual reality-augmented differentiable simulations for digital twin applications in surgical planning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Success in Diverticulitis Management: What Outcomes Really Matter?Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025Review
- Defining benchmark values for outcomes of comprehensive resection of primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a retrospective multicenter study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative complications represent a major public health burden worldwide. Without standardized, clinically relevant and universally applied endpoints, the evaluation of surgical interventions remains ill-defined and inconsistent, opening the door for biased interpretations and hampering patient-centered health care delivery. We conducted a Jury-based consensus conference incorporating the perspectives of different stakeholders, who based their recommendations on the work of nine panels of experts. The recommendations cover the selection of postoperative outcomes from the perspective of patients and other stakeholders, comparison and interpretation of outcomes, consideration of cultural and demographic factors, and strategies to deal with unwarranted outcomes. With the recommendations developed exclusively by the Jury, we provide a framework for surgical outcome assessment and quality improvement after medical interventions, that integrates the main stakeholders' perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37069361What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.