Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37068910›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Defining measures of emergency care access in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Sarah Hirner, Jyotshila Dhakal, Morgan Carol Broccoli, Madeline Ross, Emilie J Calvello Hynes, Corey B Bills

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Global emergency medicine: A scoping review of the literature from 2023.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah HirnerSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Jyotshila DhakalCollege Undergraduate Degree Programs & Studies, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Morgan Carol BroccoliEmergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Madeline RossDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Emilie J Calvello HynesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Corey B BillsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA corey.bills@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3456-6008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 50% of annual deaths in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) could be averted through access to high-quality emergency care.

objectivesWe performed a scoping review of the literature that described at least one measure of emergency care access in LMICs in order to understand relevant barriers to emergency care systems. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: English language studies published between 1 January 1990 and 30 December 2020, with one or more discrete measure(s) of access to emergency health services in LMICs described. SOURCE OF EVIDENCE: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and the grey literature. CHARTING

methodsA structured data extraction tool was used to identify and classify the number of 'unique' measures, and the number of times each unique measure was studied in the literature ('total' measures). Measures of access were categorised by access type, defined by Thomas and Penchansky, with further categorisation according to the 'Three Delay' model of seeking, reaching and receiving care, and the WHO's Emergency Care Systems Framework (ECSF).

resultsA total of 3103 articles were screened. 75 met full study inclusion. Articles were uniformly descriptive (n=75, 100%). 137 discrete measures of access were reported. Unique measures of accommodation (n=42, 30.7%) and availability (n=40, 29.2%) were most common. Measures of seeking, reaching and receiving care were 22 (16.0%), 46 (33.6%) and 69 (50.4%), respectively. According to the ECSF slightly more measures focused on prehospital care-inclusive of care at the scene and through transport to a facility (n=76, 55.4%) as compared with facility-based care (n=57, 41.6%).

conclusionsNumerous measures of emergency care access are described in the literature, but many measures are overaddressed. Development of a core set of access measures with associated minimum standards are necessary to aid in ensuring universal access to high-quality emergency care in all settings.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesEmergency Medical ServicesAccommodation, OcularHumansQuality of Health CareACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEHealth policyInternational health servicesPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID37068910
PMCPMC10111883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.