Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37068902›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2023

Analysing multimodal data that have been collected using photovoice as a research method.

Roisin Mooney, Kamaldeep Bhui, Co-Pact Project Team

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Families' Perceptions of Powered Mobility for Participation in Children With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1: A Photovoice Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Experiences of Living With the Nonmotor Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease: A Photovoice Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roisin MooneyCHiMES Collaborative, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK roisin.mooney@psych.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5792-3314
Kamaldeep BhuiCHiMES Collaborative, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Co-Pact Project Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCreative arts practice can enhance the depth and quality of mental health research by capturing and foregrounding participants' lived experience. Creative methods are emotionally activating and promote multiple perspectives, tolerating ambiguities and uncertainties, which are shared and even celebrated. KEY ARGUMENTS: Methods such as photovoice use imagery to elucidate narratives that are not easily captured by more traditional interview-based research techniques. However, the use of creative methods and participatory research remains novel as there is little guidance of how to navigate conceptual, practical, and analytical challenges.

conclusionThis paper considers these challenges, and puts forward practical and theory informed recommendations, using as study of photovoice methods for investigating ethnic inequalities in the use of the mental health act (Co-Pact) as a case study.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchResearch DesignHumansMental HealthNarrationPhotographymental healthpsychiatryqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID37068902
PMCPMC10111907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.