Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37068892›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Oxytocin versus prostaglandins for labour Induction of women with an unfavourable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening (OPIC): protocol for an open multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.

Marion De Berti, Amélie Le Gouge, Fanny Monmousseau, Denis Gallot, Loïc Sentilhes, Norbert Winer, Guillaume Legendre, Raoul Desbriere, Aude Girault, Jordan Pozzi and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04949633 (Oxytocine Versus Prostaglandines Pour le déclenchement du Travail Des Femmes Dont le Col Est défavorable après 24 Heures de Maturation Cervicale), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04949633 phase3recruitingnot on this map

Oxytocine Versus Prostaglandines Pour le déclenchement du Travail Des Femmes Dont le Col Est défavorable après 24 Heures de Maturation Cervicale : Essai Multicentrique randomisé de Non infériorité

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, ToursRan2021 to 2027Enrolled1,494ConditionsCervical Ripening, Unfavorable CervixArmsProstaglandins, Oxytocin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Marion De BertiMaternité Olympe de Gouges, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Tours, Université de Tours, Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0359-1769
Amélie Le GougeINSERM CIC 1415, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
Fanny MonmousseauTours University Hospital - Health-Economic Evaluation Unit, CHRU de Tours, Tours Area, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3673-1724
Denis GallotService de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital d'Estaing, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Maternité Clermont Ferrand, France.
Loïc SentilhesService de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin, CHRU de Bordeaux, France.
Norbert WinerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Nantes, 44093 Nantes, NUN, INRAE, UMR 1280, PhAN, F-44000 Université de Nantes, France.
Guillaume LegendreService de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.
Raoul DesbriereDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France.
Aude GiraultMaternité Port-Royal, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, FHU PREMA, F-75014, Paris, France.
Jordan PozziCHU Brest, Hôpital Morvan, service de gynécologie-obstétrique, Brest, France.
Bertrand GachonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, La Milétrie University Hospital, Poitiers France; Nantes University, Movement - Interactions - Performance, MIP, EA 4334, F-44000 Nantes, France; INSERM CIC-P 1402, La Milétrie University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
Thiphaine BarjatService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU de Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France.
Franck PerrotinMaternité Olympe de Gouges, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Tours, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Solène Brunet-HoudardTours University Hospital - Health-Economic Evaluation Unit, CHRU de Tours, Tours Area, France.
Caroline DiguistoMaternité Olympe de Gouges, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Tours, Université de Tours, Tours, France carolinediguisto@gmail.com.
Groupe de Recherche en Gynécologie Obstétrique
Université de Tours · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRHôpital Pellegrin · FRHôpital Saint Joseph · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt remains uncertain whether the most appropriate management for women with an unfavourable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening is repeating the ripening procedure or proceeding directly to induction by oxytocin. No adequately powered trial has compared these strategies. We hypothesise that induction of labour with oxytocin among women who have just undergone an ineffective first ripening procedure is not associated with a higher risk of caesarean delivery than a repeated cervical ripening with prostaglandins. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a multicentre, non-inferiority, open-label, randomised controlled trial aimed at comparing labour induction by oxytocin with a second cervical ripening that uses prostaglandins (slow-release vaginal dinoprostone; oral misoprostol 25 µg; dinoprostone vaginal gel 2 mg). Women (n=1494) randomised in a 1:1 ratio in 10 French maternity units must be ≥18 years with a singleton fetus in vertex presentation, at a term from ≥37+0 weeks of gestation, and have just completed a 24-hour cervical ripening procedure by any method (pharmacological or mechanical) with a Bishop score ≤6. Exclusion criteria comprise being in labour, having more than 3 contractions per 10 min, or a prior caesarean delivery or a history of uterine surgery, or a fetus with antenatally suspected severe congenital abnormalities or a non-reassuring fetal heart rate. The primary endpoint will be the caesarean delivery rate, regardless of indication. Secondary outcomes concern delivery, perinatal morbidity, maternal satisfaction and health economic evaluations. The nature of the assessed procedures prevents masking the study investigators and patients to group assignment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All participants will provide written informed consent. The ethics committee 'Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France VII' approved this study on 2 April 2021 (No 2021-000989-15). Study findings will be submitted for publication and presented at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04949633.

Indexed as

Abortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalLabor, InducedOxytocicsCervical RipeningCervix UteriDinoprostoneEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicOxytocinPregnancyProstaglandinsAbortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalDinoprostoneOxytocicsOxytocinProstaglandinsmaternal medicineorganisation of health servicesprotocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID37068892
PMCPMC10111897
OpenAlexW4366084762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.