Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37068889›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2023

Feasibility pilot trial for the Trajectories of Recovery after Intravenous propofol versus inhaled VolatilE anesthesia (THRIVE) pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Bethany R Tellor Pennington, Douglas A Colquhoun, Mark D Neuman, Mary C Politi, Allison M Janda, Cathie Spino, Steven Thelen-Perry, Zhenke Wu, Sathish S Kumar, Stephen H Gregory and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05346588 (Feasibility Study for the Trajectories of Recovery After Intravenous Propofol Versus Inhaled VolatilE Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05346588 phase3completednot on this map

Feasibility Study for the Trajectories of Recovery After Intravenous Propofol Versus Inhaled VolatilE Anesthesia (THRIVE) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2022 to 2023Enrolled300ConditionsSurgery--Complications, Anesthesia Complication, Anesthesia Awareness, Anesthesia Emergence DeliriumArmsAnesthetic technique Propofol TIVA, Anesthetic technique inhaled agent
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bethany R Tellor Pennington *Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA penningtonb@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1571-6434
Douglas A Colquhoun *Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1304-9164
Mark D NeumanAnesthesiology & Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mary C PolitiSurgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9103-6495
Allison M JandaAnesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5080-5630
Cathie SpinoBiostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Steven Thelen-PerryBiostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Zhenke WuBiostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Sathish S KumarAnesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-5104
Stephen H GregoryAnesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Michael S AvidanAnesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Sachin KheterpalAnesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
THRIVE research group
Michigan Medicine · USWashington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Data Driven Approaches to Improving Risk Prediction of Pulmonary Complications After Major Inpatient SurgeryK08HL159327 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COLQUHOUN, DOUGLAS ALASTAIR · 2021 to 2025
$811k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL159327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMillions of patients receive general anaesthesia for surgery annually. Crucial gaps in evidence exist regarding which technique, propofol total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) or inhaled volatile anaesthesia (INVA), yields superior patient experience, safety and outcomes. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a large comparative effectiveness trial assessing patient experiences and outcomes after receiving propofol TIVA or INVA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was cocreated by a diverse team, including patient partners with personal experience of TIVA or INVA. The design is a 300-patient, two-centre, randomised, feasibility pilot trial. Patients 18 years of age or older, undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery requiring general anaesthesia with a tracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway will be eligible. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to propofol TIVA or INVA, stratified by centre and procedural complexity. The feasibility endpoints include: (1) proportion of patients approached who agree to participate; (2) proportion of patients who receive their assigned randomised treatment; (3) completeness of outcomes data collection and (4) feasibility of data management procedures. Proportions and 95% CIs will be calculated to assess whether prespecified thresholds are met for the feasibility parameters. If the lower bounds of the 95% CI are above the thresholds of 10% for the proportion of patients agreeing to participate among those approached and 80% for compliance with treatment allocation for each randomised treatment group, this will suggest that our planned pragmatic 12 500-patient comparative effectiveness trial can likely be conducted successfully. Other feasibility outcomes and adverse events will be described. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the ethics board at Washington University (IRB# 202205053), serving as the single Institutional Review Board for both participating sites. Recruitment began in September 2022. Dissemination plans include presentations at scientific conferences, scientific publications, internet-based educational materials and mass media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05346588.

Indexed as

PropofolAdministration, IntravenousAdolescentAdultAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, IntravenousFeasibility StudiesHumansPilot ProjectsPropofolgeneral anesthesiainhaled volatile anesthesiatotal intravenous anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID37068889
PMCPMC10111921
OpenAlexW4366084715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.