Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37068238›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Fear circuit-based neurobehavioral signatures mirror resilience to chronic social stress in mouse.

Sarah Ayash, Thomas Lingner, Anna Ramisch, Soojin Ryu, Raffael Kalisch, Ulrich Schmitt, Marianne B Müller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sarah AyashLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz 55122, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5146-1040
Thomas LingnerGenevention GmbH, Göttingen 37079, Germany.
Anna RamischDepartment of Basic Neuroscience, University of Geneva, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0641-4330
Soojin RyuInstitute for Human Genetics, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7059-0160
Raffael KalischLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz 55122, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9503-7601
Ulrich SchmittLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz 55122, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5657-4527
Marianne B MüllerLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz 55122, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEGenevention (Germany) · DEUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consistent evidence from human data points to successful threat-safety discrimination and responsiveness to extinction of fear memories as key characteristics of resilient individuals. To promote valid cross-species approaches for the identification of resilience mechanisms, we establish a translationally informed mouse model enabling the stratification of mice into three phenotypic subgroups following chronic social defeat stress, based on their individual ability for threat-safety discrimination and conditioned learning: the

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalFearAffectAnimalsAvoidance LearningExtinction, PsychologicalHumansMiceStress, Psychologicalextinctionfear circuitmouse modelthreat–safety discriminationtranscriptional signatures

Identifiers

PMID37068238
PMCPMC10151471
OpenAlexW4366140622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.