Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37068098›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Rare-event sampling analysis uncovers the fitness landscape of the genetic code.

Yuji Omachi, Nen Saito, Chikara Furusawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Science of the gaps.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuji OmachiGraduate School of Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan.
Nen SaitoGraduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8317-9389
Chikara FurusawaGraduate School of Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3554-4975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic code refers to a rule that maps 64 codons to 20 amino acids. Nearly all organisms, with few exceptions, share the same genetic code, the standard genetic code (SGC). While it remains unclear why this universal code has arisen and been maintained during evolution, it may have been preserved under selection pressure. Theoretical studies comparing the SGC and numerically created hypothetical random genetic codes have suggested that the SGC has been subject to strong selection pressure for being robust against translation errors. However, these prior studies have searched for random genetic codes in only a small subspace of the possible code space due to limitations in computation time. Thus, how the genetic code has evolved, and the characteristics of the genetic code fitness landscape, remain unclear. By applying multicanonical Monte Carlo, an efficient rare-event sampling method, we efficiently sampled random codes from a much broader random ensemble of genetic codes than in previous studies, estimating that only one out of every 1020 random codes is more robust than the SGC. This estimate is significantly smaller than the previous estimate, one in a million. We also characterized the fitness landscape of the genetic code that has four major fitness peaks, one of which includes the SGC. Furthermore, genetic algorithm analysis revealed that evolution under such a multi-peaked fitness landscape could be strongly biased toward a narrow peak, in an evolutionary path-dependent manner.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic CodeAlgorithmsAmino AcidsCodonModels, GeneticAmino AcidsCodon

Identifiers

PMID37068098
PMCPMC10138212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.