Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37067700›Full record

ReviewCancer causes & control : CCC2023

Twenty years of capacity building across the cancer prevention and control research network.

Mary Wangen, Cam Escoffery, Maria E Fernandez, Daniela B Friedman, Peggy Hannon, Linda K Ko, Annette E Maxwell, Courtney Petagna, Betsy Risendal, Catherine Rohweder and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Lessons Learned from Community Partners: Strengthening a Mini-grants Process to Advance Health Equity.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Mary WangenCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. wange062@live.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0780-1188
Cam EscofferyRollins School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4445-009X
Maria E FernandezSchool of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4820-821X
Daniela B FriedmanDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9359-093X
Peggy HannonSchool of Public Health, Health Promotion Research Center, The University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0922-5893
Linda K KoSchool of Public Health, Health Promotion Research Center, The University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1090-6637
Annette E MaxwellLos Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Health Policy and Management, The University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2334-8582
Courtney PetagnaRollins School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0754-257X
Betsy RisendalColorado School of Public Health, Department of Community & Behavioral Health, The University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2222-6399
Catherine RohwederCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7684-9671
Jennifer LeemanSchool of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3130-8297
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USEmory University · USUniversity of Washington · USColorado School of Public Health · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research CenterU48DP006377 · DP · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KEGLER, MICHELLE C · 2018 to 2023
$13.5M
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research CenterU48DP006398 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HANNON, MARGARET A · 2018 to 2023
$11.6M
Understanding Pathways to Earlier Diagnosis for Ovarian Cancer in North CarolinaU48DP006400 · DP · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI AMMERMAN, ALICE S, LEEMAN, JENNIFER · 2018 to 2023
$9.3M
USC PRC Center and Core Research Project: National Implementation Study of the Faith, Activity, and Nutrition (FAN) ProgramU48DP006401 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI WILCOX, SARA · 2018 to 2023
$8.0M
Rocky Mountain Prevention Research CenterU48DP006399 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI LEIFERMAN, JENN A, PUMA, JINI · 2018 to 2023
$6.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006377NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006398NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006399NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006400NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo improve population health, community members need capacity (i.e., knowledge, skills, and tools) to select and implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to fit the needs of their local settings. Since 2002, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has funded the national Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) to accelerate the implementation of cancer prevention and control EBIs in communities. The CPCRN has developed multiple strategies to build community members' capacity to implement EBIs. This paper describes the history of CPCRN's experience developing and lessons learned through the use of five capacity-building strategies: (1) mini-grant programs, (2) training, (3) online tools, (4) evidence academies, and (5) evaluation support for partners' capacity-building initiatives.

methodsWe conducted a narrative review of peer-reviewed publications and grey literature reports on CPCRN capacity-building activities. Guided by the Interactive Systems Framework, we developed histories, case studies, and lessons learned for each strategy. Lessons were organized into themes.

resultsThree themes emerged: the importance of (1) community-engagement prior to and during implementation of capacity-building strategies, (2) establishing and sustaining partnerships, and (3) co-learning at the levels of centers, networks, and beyond.

conclusionCPCRN activities have increased the ability of community organizations to compete for external funds to support implementation, increased the use of evidence in real-world settings, and promoted the broad-scale implementation of cancer control interventions across more than eight states. Lessons from this narrative review highlight the value of long-term thematic networks and provide useful guidance to other research networks and future capacity-building efforts.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingNeoplasmsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Delivery of Health CareHumansUnited StatesCapacity buildingEvaluationEvidence academiesImplementation practiceMini grantsOnline toolsTraining

Identifiers

PMID37067700
PMCPMC10106885
OpenAlexW4366083540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.