Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37067602›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2023

New therapies for spinal muscular atrophy: where we stand and what is next.

Laura Antonaci, Maria Carmela Pera, Eugenio Mercuri

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06599606 (Investigation of the Relationship Between Ultrasonographic Muscle Thickness Measurement and Echogenicity Assessment With Functional Scales in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06599606 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of the Relationship Between Ultrasonographic Muscle Thickness Measurement and Echogenicity Assessment With Functional Scales in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy: An Observational, Cross-Sectional, Case-Control Study

TypeobservationalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled34ConditionsSpinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), Neuromuscular DiseaseArmsUltrasonographic Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Exploring variability in cognitive functioning in patients with spinal muscular atrophy: a scoping review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura AntonaciCentro Clinico Nemo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4753-8441
Maria Carmela PeraPediatric Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6777-1721
Eugenio MercuriCentro Clinico Nemo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. eugeniomaria.mercuri@unicatt.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9851-5365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The natural history of spinal muscular atrophy has been radically changed by the advent of improved standards of care and the availability of disease-modifying therapies. The aim of this paper is to provide the current therapeutic scenario including new perspectives and to report the challenges related to new phenotypes a few years after the therapies have become available. The paper also includes a review of real-world data that provides information on safety and efficacy in individuals that were not included in clinical trials. Special attention is paid to future perspectives both in terms of new drugs that are currently investigated in clinical trials or providing details on current developments in the use of the available drugs, including combination therapies or new modalities of dose or administration.  Conclusion: Clinical trials and real world data support the efficacy and safety profiles of the available drugs. At the moment there is not enough published evidence about the superiority of one product compared to the others. What is Known: • Safety and efficacy results of clinical trials have led in the last 6 years to the marketing of three drugs for spinal muscular atrophy, with different mechanisms of action. What is New: • Since the drug's approval, real-world data allow us to have data on bigger and heterogeneous groups of patients in contrast with those included in clinical trials. • In addition to the new molecules, combinations of therapies are currently being evaluated.

Indexed as

Muscular Atrophy, SpinalHumansClinical trialCombined therapiesReal-world dataSpinal muscular atrophyTherapy

Identifiers

PMID37067602
PMCPMC10354145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.