Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37067601›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

2nd and 3rd generation full endoscopic lumbar spine surgery: clinical safety and learning curve.

B Balain, Davinder Singh Bhachu, A Gadkari, A Ghodke, J H Kuiper

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Digital three-dimensional assisted unilateral biportal endoscopy in treatment of highly isolated lumbar disc herniation with translaminar approach].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B BalainCentre for Spinal Disorders, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthoapedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY107AG, UK. bbalain@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-8689
Davinder Singh BhachuCentre for Spinal Disorders, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthoapedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY107AG, UK.
A GadkariCentre for Spinal Disorders, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthoapedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY107AG, UK.
A GhodkeCentre for Spinal Disorders, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthoapedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY107AG, UK.
J H KuiperCentre for Spinal Disorders, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthoapedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY107AG, UK.
Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim2nd and 3rd generation endoscopic spine surgery techniques offer visualisation of familiar inter-laminar anatomy to spinal surgeons. We have prospectively evaluated the clinical outcome, complications and learning curve associated with these techniques in patients with lumbar spine radiculopathy.

methodsThis is a prospective study of 50 consecutive patients with radicular pain from disc herniation and/or lateral recess stenosis. In 6 patients, endoscopy couldn't be done. Operating times, PROM's (VAS, ODI and EQ-5D scores) and complication rates of 44 patients were evaluated after mean FU of 52 months (range 39-65). MRI was used to divide these into protrusions (n = 19), extrusions (n = 17) and lateral recess stenosis (n = 8). Evidence about the learning curve was gathered by curvilinear regression analyses.

resultsUsing a composite clinical success criterion, 95% patients had a successful outcome, with no major complications. ODI, VAS and EQ-5D scores had a statistically significant improvement and achieved MCID. Revision discectomy rate was only 4.5% (n = 2). MRI based grouping, case sequence and degree of difficulty influenced the duration of surgery and a learning curve was found for protrusions and lateral recess decompressions, but not for extrusions. A learning curve effect was also observed with respect to the ODI.

conclusionsAlthough anatomy visualised in 2nd and 3rd generation endoscopy is familiar to spinal surgeons, our learning curve experience suggests a careful and MRI pathology based take up of this technique in clinical practice, despite its clinical safety in our series. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, prospective cohort study.

Indexed as

Diskectomy, PercutaneousIntervertebral Disc DisplacementRadiculopathyConstriction, PathologicEndoscopyHumansLearning CurveLumbar VertebraeProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFull endoscopic spine surgeryLearning curvePercutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy

Identifiers

PMID37067601
OpenAlexW4366083632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.