Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37067579›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2024

Exploring mechanisms of change in the metacognitive training for depression.

Franziska Miegel, Julian Rubel, Mona Dietrichkeit, Marion Hagemann-Goebel, Amir H Yassari, Alicia Balzar, Jakob Scheunemann, Lena Jelinek

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06312241 (Feasibility, Acceptance and Efficacy of Metacognitive Training-Silver BeWell in Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06312241 naunknown statusnot on this map

Feasibility, Acceptance and Efficacy of Metacognitive Training-Silver BeWell in Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsDepressive Symptoms, Well-Being, PsychologicalArmsMetacognitive Training-Silver BeWell
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Franziska MiegelDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. f.miegel@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2845-8665
Julian RubelDepartment of Psychology and Sports Science, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Mona DietrichkeitDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Marion Hagemann-GoebelDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Asklepios Clinic North, Hamburg, Germany.
Amir H YassariDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Alicia BalzarDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Jakob ScheunemannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Lena JelinekDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEAsklepios · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT) is a highly structured group therapy that has been shown to be effective in reducing depressive symptoms. First evidence suggests that need for control represents a mechanism of change. However, more research is needed to evaluate the mode of action of each module and identify predictors of treatment response. Two sequential studies (one naturalistic pilot study [study I, N = 45] and one randomized controlled trial [study II, N = 32]) were conducted to evaluate the session-specific effects and predictors of D-MCT in patients with depression. The D-MCT was conducted over eight weeks, and patients answered a questionnaire on dysfunctional beliefs (e.g., negative filter) and depressive symptoms (e.g., lack of energy, self-esteem) before and after each session. Linear mixed-effects models showed that several dysfunctional beliefs and symptoms improved over the course of the treatment; three modules were able to evoke within-session effects, but no between-session effects were found. The improvement in lack of energy in one module was identified as a relevant predictor in study I via lasso regression but was not replicated in study II. Exploratory analyses revealed further predictors that warrant replication in future studies. The identified predictors were inconclusive when the two studies were compared, which may be explained by the different instruments administered. Even so, the results may be used to revise questionnaires and improve the intervention.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMetacognitionPsychotherapy, GroupDepressionHumansPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeCBTCognitive therapyDepressionGroup interventionMechanisms of change

Identifiers

PMID37067579
OpenAlexW4366083918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.