Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37067072›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2023

Representation of the inferred relationships in a map-like space.

Jinhui Li, Qunjun Liang, Jiajun Liao, Senning Zheng, Kemeng Chen, Ruiwang Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jinhui LiSchool of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Brain Cognition and Educational Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Qunjun LiangSchool of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Brain Cognition and Educational Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiajun LiaoSchool of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Brain Cognition and Educational Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Senning ZhengSchool of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Brain Cognition and Educational Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Kemeng ChenSchool of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Brain Cognition and Educational Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Ruiwang HuangSchool of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Brain Cognition and Educational Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3889-169X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cognitive map is an internal representation of the external world that guides flexible behavior in a complex environment. Cognitive map theory assumes that relationships between entities can be organized using Euclidean-based coordinates. Previous studies revealed that cognitive map theory can also be generalized to inferences about abstract spaces, such as social spaces. However, it is still unclear whether humans can construct a cognitive map by combining relational knowledge between discrete entities with multiple abstract dimensions in nonsocial spaces. Here we asked subjects to learn to navigate a novel object space defined by two feature dimensions, price and abstraction. The subjects first learned the rank relationships between objects in each feature dimension and then completed a transitive inferences task. We recorded brain activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while they performed the transitive inference task. By analyzing the behavioral data, we found that the Euclidean distance between objects had a significant effect on response time (RT). The longer the one-dimensional rank distance and two-dimensional (2D) Euclidean distance between objects the shorter the RT. The task-fMRI data were analyzed using both univariate analysis and representational similarity analysis. We found that the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and medial orbitofrontal cortex were able to represent the Euclidean distance between objects in 2D space. Our findings suggest that relationship inferences between discrete objects can be made in a 2D nonsocial space and that the neural basis of this inference is related to cognitive maps.

Indexed as

Entorhinal CortexHippocampusFrontal LobeHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal Cortexdecision makingentorhinal cortexhippocampuslearningmedial orbitofrontal cortextransitive inference

Identifiers

PMID37067072
PMCPMC10203794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.