Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37066931›Full record

ArticleTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2023

Preliminary study on the effect of ozone exposure on blood glucose level in rats.

Hui Yang, Xue Xiao, Gaoyun Chen, Xiangfei Chen, Tingting Gao, Li Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui YangThe Central Theater General Hospital of PLA, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xue XiaoWuhan Qingchuan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Gaoyun ChenThe Institute of NBC Defense, Beijing, China.
Xiangfei ChenThe Central Theater General Hospital of PLA, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Tingting GaoThe Central Theater General Hospital of PLA, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Li XuThe Institute of NBC Defense, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, people have paid more and more attention to the health hazards caused by O3 exposure, which will become a major problem after fine particulate matter (PM).

objectiveTo investigate the effects of ozone (O3) exposure on blood glucose levels in rats under different concentrations and times.

methodsEighty rats were divided into control group and three ozone concentration groups. Each group was continuously exposed for 1d, 3d and, 6d, and exposed for 6 hours daily. After exposure, GTT, FBG, and random blood glucose were measured.

resultsThe FBG value increased significantly on the 6th day of 0.5 ppm and the 3rd and 6th days of 1.0 ppm exposure compared with the control group (P< 0.05). The random blood glucose value was significantly increased on the 3rd and 6th days of each exposure concentration (P< 0.05). When exposed to 1 ppm concentration, the 120 min GTT value of 1 d, 3 d and, 6 d was significantly higher than that of the control group (P< 0.05).

conclusionAfter acute O3 exposure, the blood glucose level of rats was affected by the exposure concentration and time. The concentration of 0.1 ppm had no significant impact on FBG and random blood glucose, and O3 with a concentration of 0.1 ppm and 0.5 ppm had no significant impact on values of GTT at 90 min, and 120 min.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseOzoneAnimalsParticulate MatterRatsBlood GlucoseOzoneParticulate Matterfasting blood glucoseglucose tolerance testsOzonerandom blood glucose

Identifiers

PMID37066931
PMCPMC10200197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.