Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37066918›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2023

Screening and Assessment for Alzheimer's Disease in the Days of Biological Biomarkers.

Hugh C Hendrie

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hugh C HendrieDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG010133 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAYKIN, ANDREW J · 1991 to 2020
$37.3M
Research Education ComponentP30AG072976 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI ANDREW J SAYKIN · 2021 to 2026
$24.1M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010133NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 1980s saw an upsurge of research in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The necessity of standardized assessment batteries became apparent, leading to the development of standardized instruments, such as the CERAD, the CAMDEX, the CSI 'D', and later the TOOLBOX. The advent of new biological markers has led to speculation in the research community about the necessity for these instruments. As the association of biomarkers with subsequent clinical dementia remains unclear, assessment batteries are still necessary, especially with growing evidence that prodromal symptoms of AD may not be cognitive decline but emotional or behavioral symptoms. Inclusion of ethnic minority groups is also essential.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionBiomarkersDisease ProgressionEthnicityHumansMinority GroupsBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseasebiological markersethnic minority representationstandardized assessment tools

Identifiers

PMID37066918
PMCPMC10846840
OpenAlexW4364361045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.