ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023
California sea lions interfere with striped marlin hunting behaviour in multi-species predator aggregations.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food, fear and physics drive collective behaviour in the ocean's pelagic zone.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Review
- Increases in foraging performance of humpback whales in multi-predator feeding aggregations with California sea lions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Article
- Multi-predatory feeding aggregations in the Norwegian Sea: prevalence and ecological importance.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Review
- Locomotion and hunting strategies of large vertebrate predators in pelagic waters.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Review
- The presence of mahi-mahi at multi-predator feeding aggregations modifies striped marlin attack behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- Cooperative foraging between dolphins and fish-eating killer whales.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sailfish generate foraging opportunities for seabirds in multi-species predator aggregations.Biology letters · 2024Article
- California sea lions interfere with striped marlin hunting behaviour in multi-species predator aggregations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Mixed-species groups and aggregations: shaping ecological and behavioural patterns and processes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The open ocean offers a suite of ecological conditions promoting the occurrence of multi-species predator aggregations. These mixed predator aggregations typically hunt large groups of relatively small and highly cohesive prey. However, the mechanisms and functions of these mixed predator aggregations are largely unknown. Even basic knowledge of whether the predator species' interactions are mutualistic, commensal or parasitic is typically missing. Moreover, recordings of attack and capture rates of marine multi-species predator aggregations, which are critical in understanding how and why these interactions have evolved, are almost completely non-existent owing to logistical challenges. Using underwater video, we quantified the attack and capture rates of two high-trophic level marine predators, California sea lions (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.