Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37066415›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Evolution of neuronal cell classes and types in the vertebrate retina.

Joshua Hahn, Aboozar Monavarfeshani, Mu Qiao, Allison Kao, Yvonne Kölsch, Ayush Kumar, Vincent P Kunze, Ashley M Rasys, Rose Richardson, Herwig Baier and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Joshua HahnDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Aboozar MonavarfeshaniDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, MA 02138, USA.
Mu QiaoDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Allison KaoDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, MA 02138, USA.
Yvonne KölschMax Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Ayush KumarDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Vincent P KunzeRetinal Neurophysiology Section, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Ashley M RasysDepartment of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
Rose RichardsonDivision of Neuroscience and Centre for Biological Timing, Faculty of Biology Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Upper Brook Street, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Herwig BaierMax Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Robert J LucasDivision of Neuroscience and Centre for Biological Timing, Faculty of Biology Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Upper Brook Street, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Wei LiRetinal Neurophysiology Section, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Markus MeisterDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Joshua T TrachtenbergDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Wenjun YanDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, MA 02138, USA.
Yi-Rong PengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stein Eye Institute, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095 United States.
Joshua R SanesDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, MA 02138, USA.
Karthik ShekharDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Harvard University · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · USMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DENational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Manchester · GBDoheny Eye Institute · USQB3 · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

T32 Predoctoral training grant in geneticsT32GM007103 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI DYER, KELLY A · 1985 to 2021
$5.9M
Comprehensive Classification Of Neuronal Subtypes By Single Cell TranscriptomicsU01MH105960 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI REGEV, AVIV, SANES, JOSHUA R · 2014 to 2016
$4.5M
Uncovering the molecular identity of retinal cell types, and their responses to nerve injury using single-cell transcriptomicsR00EY028625 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SHEKHAR, KARTHIK · 2020 to 2022
$740k
Defining cell types of foveal and peripheral retina by high-throughput, single-celltranscriptional profilingR21EY028633 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI DO, MICHAEL TRI HOANG, SANES, JOSHUA R · 2018 to 2019
$487k
Transcriptional signatures of glaucomatous retinal and optic nerve head cellsK99EY033457 · NEI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MONAVARFESHANI, ABOOZAR · 2022 to 2022
$119k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY033457NEI NIH HHS R00 EY028625NEI NIH HHS R21 EY028633NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007103NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH105960Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basic plan of the retina is conserved across vertebrates, yet species differ profoundly in their visual needs (Baden et al., 2020). One might expect that retinal cell types evolved to accommodate these varied needs, but this has not been systematically studied. Here, we generated and integrated single-cell transcriptomic atlases of the retina from 17 species: humans, two non-human primates, four rodents, three ungulates, opossum, ferret, tree shrew, a teleost fish, a bird, a reptile and a lamprey. Molecular conservation of the six retinal cell classes (photoreceptors, horizontal cells, bipolar cells, amacrine cells, retinal ganglion cells [RGCs] and Muller glia) is striking, with transcriptomic differences across species correlated with evolutionary distance. Major subclasses are also conserved, whereas variation among types within classes or subclasses is more pronounced. However, an integrative analysis revealed that numerous types are shared across species based on conserved gene expression programs that likely trace back to the common ancestor of jawed vertebrates. The degree of variation among types increases from the outer retina (photoreceptors) to the inner retina (RGCs), suggesting that evolution acts preferentially to shape the retinal output. Finally, we identified mammalian orthologs of midget RGCs, which comprise >80% of RGCs in the human retina, subserve high-acuity vision, and were believed to be primate-specific (Berson, 2008); in contrast, the mouse orthologs comprise <2% of mouse RGCs. Projections both primate and mouse orthologous types are overrepresented in the thalamus, which supplies the primary visual cortex. We suggest that midget RGCs are not primate innovations, but descendants of evolutionarily ancient types that decreased in size and increased in number as primates evolved, thereby facilitating high visual acuity and increased cortical processing of visual information.

Identifiers

PMID37066415
PMCPMC10104162
OpenAlexW4362722764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.